Feeds

Wikipedia springs free labor leak

Where have all the fiddlers gone?

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Wikipedia is leaking free labor - and fast.

As reported by The Wall Street Journal, a new Wikistudy says that in the first three months of the year, the "encyclopedia anyone can edit" lost 49,000 more volunteer contributors than it gained. That's ten times the net loss from the same period last year, according to a study compiled from public data by independent Wikiresearcher Felipe Ortega.

Free labor - along with some helpful Google algorithms - has built Wikipedia into the web's fifth most popular site. And as the volunteers flee, you have to wonder what the future holds. Will the site continue to expand? Will errors increase? Or decrease? Will the farce be as farcical?

Speaking with The Journal, the Wikimedia Foundation - the not-for-profit that oversees Wikipedia - says there's no reason for Wikialarm. "We need sufficient people to do the work that needs to be done," is the word from executive director Sue Gardner. "But the purpose of the project is not participation."

Officially, the purpose of the project is to provide free online access to "the sum of all human knowledge." But the site has served other purposes as well. Co-Founder Jimmy Wales, for instance, has been known to use the project as a means of seduction. And it's a great way to hide an epic financial scam.

Or at least it was.

Since the great naked shorting scandal, the site has gone a long way towards reforming itself. It has jettisoned longtime editors intent on rigging site content, while softening an unworkable belief that anyone should have the power to edit anything at any time. The site's inner circle has even gone so far as to ban the Church of Scientology.

In other words, Wikipedia is becoming less like a game and more like, well, an encyclopedia. Which could explain why so many people are leaving.

Of course, if enough people leave, the pendulum may once again swing the other way. We can only hope that it does. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Microsoft EU warns: If you have ties to the US, Feds can get your data
European corps can't afford to get complacent while American Big Biz battles Uncle Sam
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.