The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

California votes in HD TV power pruning law

Standby not good enough?

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Legislators in California have voted to exterminate overly energy-hungry TVs, creating a law that insists the state’s tellies meet strict energy consumption standards.

Set to come into force in 2011, the law will require TVs with screen sizes of 58in or less to consume 33 per cent less electricity than existing models do. For example, a 42in TV must, by 2011, consume no more than 183W.

The law will also require these screen to cut their energy consumption by 49 per cent by the year 2013, compared to today’s levels.

The California Energy Commission (CEC), which approved the standard, claimed the move will have saved sufficient energy by 2021 to power 864,000 single-family homes.

The standard – the first of its kind for a US state – will save $8.1bn (£4.8bn/€5.4bn) in energy costs in California by 2021, the CEC added, while energy firm Pacific Gas & Electric estimated that the move will reduce CO2 emissions by 3m metric tons over one decade.

TVs larger than 58in have apparently been left out as a concession to home cinema retailers and installers – no doubt a thriving business across many wealthy parts of California. ®

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Latest Comments

What we really need..

Is a remote control that can pull plugs out of sockets.. problem sorted.

I do love the round TV idea though, because he's right.

0
0

AC: Nope, you've FAILED this time I'm afraid!

Yes, control buttons on remote controls are in a matrix which must be scanned. HOWEVER, while the device is waiting for ANY button to be pressed, NO scanning is needed - you simply apply a DC signal to all the lines on one side of the matrix, and look for a signal on all the lines on the other side. Once you've detected that a button has been pressed, you THEN start up the clock and scan, to find out which button(s) are involved.

Now, how would YOU rate YOUR knowledge of electronics after that? Hmm - slightly above zero I think, but a classic case of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing.

You'd better make sure you're correct before using the "FAIL" icon or... you'd better remain anonymous for fear of being made to look a right plonker!

0
0

@Michael C

"3) remove speakers from the TV. (who uses the built in speakers in 40" LCD's anyway?)"

I do and on a 42" at that. I also check the quality of such in the shop and crappy internal speakers are a deal breaker. I'll fire up the surround system for films and anything important, but for just watching ordinary telly (most of which is stero only anyway) it's too intrusive into family life and unnecessary.

Likewise, the thought of Cartoon Network going in the background in several hundred watts of crystal clear 5.1 makes me shudder.

Finally, given my habit of watching things late at night, the neighbours would have put both barrels of a 12-gauge through my KEF subwoofer by now.......

0
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Curtain drops on Apple Store ahead of WWDC: What lies behind?
Steve Jobs watching from on high. No pressure, lads
 breaking news
Cold, dead hands of Steve Jobs slip from iPhones: The Cult of Ive is upon us
Billionaire biz baron's death clears way for uber-shiny iOS 7
Airbus imagines suitcases that find themselves
Point your mobe at your smalls to track their every move
Surprise! Intel smartphone trounces ARM in power trials
Tests show equal performance while sipping significantly less juice
First look: iOS 7 for iPad
No, Apple hasn't released it yet, but that doesn't stop intrepid devs
Apple said to be 'exploring' 5.7-inch iPhone
Who's the copycat this time, Mr. Cook?
Review: Belkin Thunderbolt Express Dock
Missing Mac ports reunited, for a price
 breaking news
Australian 'Apple tax' repealed for MacBook Air
But the new MacPro is priced at a premium