The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Time Warner names day for AOL spin-off

The end's in sight

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Time Warner has detailed the departure date for its troubled internet business AOL.

On 9 December all Time Warner shareholders will get one AOL share for every 11 TW shares they own. Time Warner shares will continue to trade as normal with the ticker TWZ and AOL shares will trade under the AOL ticker. When the two first merged AOL shareholders got one Time Warner share for each share they owned in the ISP.

Anyone owning a fractional share in AOL will have to wait. The fractions will be sold on the open market and the proceeds distributed as cash payments to shareholders.

Time Warner's press release is here.

AOL bought Time Warner in a $160bn deal during the dot-com hysteria of 2000. Despite all the talk of creating a brave new media world the merger never really worked and AOL has been looking for a role since its original ISP business began to fade. ®

Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider

Latest Comments

AOL sucked even before the merger

I remember them veeery well. There's a reason www.aolsucks.org *still* exists. Their "free" trials required you to give 'em your credit card, and cancelling would be extremely difficult. They also charged $40/month for what was basically dialup services, even when real broadband started to charge $40/month as well.

AOL might have had good ideas on other areas, but they were the dumb man's ISP, and not only in the "internet n00bz" sense. They can burn in hell!

0
0

@Bilgepipe

No, infact AOL bought TW. I am a former employee of AOL, and still have many friends at AOL. AOL bought TW and then the TW suits bullied themselves into power rather quickly and destroyed AOL. AOL had the right idea, and if they were allowed to pull it off, would be a market leader in digital streaming content. They bought TW for the specific purpose of streaming thier catalogue online. AOL had the people and recources to do this easily. the TW suits wouldn't have that, so they basically took over from the inside, and somehow AOL became a property of TW. If you talk to any long time AOL employee, you will get a story of how TW F'd AOL, and for the 4 years I was there, I saw a little of that. Every year or two TW would replace the CEO of AOL, who would then close departments and lay off people, thus reducing costs, and earning a huge performance bonus. There is allot of talent at AOL still. If someone with some stones would take the helm, and development of ideas and creation of properties started taking place again, AOL could be around for a while. I'm not sure what will happen with PlatformA, which is the advertising arm, basically a different company ripped from AOLs recources.

0
0

It was more of a merger than a who-bought-who

They formed a new company in the merger called AOL Time Warner and gave each others' share holders stock in the new company.

http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,667602,00.html

0
0

More from The Register

Microsoft to open Windows Stores inside 600 Best Buy locations
Product showcases 'must be seen to be believed'
Author Iain (M) Banks falls to cancer at 59
Misses the release of his final work
 breaking news
What did the Lehman Brothers implosion look like to a techie?
Insider tells all about the Gnab Gib at Lehmans
It's official: 'tweet' an English word – not just in the avian sense
If the Oxford English Dictionary says it is so, then it is so
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
1-in-10 e-tomes 'are self-published'... most are 'rubbish' says book ed
Publishing man scoffs at go-it-alone writers, ursines still fouling in forests
 breaking news
Facebook RSS reader said to uncloak June 20
Secret event scooped by Scottish developer?