The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

GNOME 3.0 release hits six-month buffer

Next weighty version held back from start line

What you need to know about cloud backup

The next major iteration of the GNOME desktop has been delayed by six months.

It had been expected to land in March 2010, but GNOME 3.0 will now rock up in September next year instead.

GNOME Foundation director Vincent Untz made the announcement earlier this week on the outfit's mailing list.

"Thanks to the input from the community, we were able to draw a clear picture of where we stand today and where we will be next March," he wrote.

"The release date for 3.0 was not set in stone: while we're using a strict schedule that allows us to release GNOME every six months, GNOME is above all using quality-based release engineering. That's why our community wants GNOME 3.0 to be fully working for users and why we believe September is more appropriate."

However, GNOME 2.30 is still set to be released into the wild in March 2010 as had been originally planned by the foundation.

Creating a six-month buffer between versions 2.30 and and 3.0 will effectively improve the overall quality of both releases, argued Untz.

GNOME 3.0 is expected to come loaded with a revamped user interface that will streamline the platform and, according to Untz, help beef up interest in the free, open source desktop GUI.

The founder of Linux distie Ubuntu, Mark Shuttleworth, confirmed in September that the platform's April 2010 release (10.04) - dubbed Lucid Lynx - would be based on the GNOME 2.0 desktop. But future versions are expected to support GNOME 3.0 once it lands, he said. ®

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

Gnome shell

Gnome Shell is a complete and utter piece of shit. I'm not just talking about the current state of it, I'm talking about the entire "workflow" premise and where they're trying to go with it.

How Gnome developers expect to have any credibility when they bleat on about their "consistency" and focus on "usability", is anyone's guess.

1
0

Following in the tracks of KDE 4

KDE 4.0 was originally planned for late 2006 but slipped to jan 2008 - a bit later may be 'more polished' but does not necessarily mean 'finished' and meeting users' expectations.

0
0

Learning from the mistakes of KDE

Looks like they are learning from the mistakes of KDE.

Now don't get me wrong, KDE is a great Desktop environment (I used to use KDE 3.5) and I know KDE 4.x is improving with every release but I felt that the first release of KDE4 was well, how can I put it, it seemed unfinished to me.

So I think it's a good idea if it means that Gnome 3.0 gets a bit more spit and polish.

Rob

0
0

More from The Register

Interwebs taunt Sir Jony over Apple eye candy makeover
Hey Ive, Ive... add more unicorns, willya?
Apple: iOS7 dayglo Barbie makeover is UNFINISHED - report
Plus: You don't like the icons? Blame marketing
Red Hat to ditch MySQL for MariaDB in RHEL 7
So long, Oracle! Don't let the door hit you on the way out
Java EE 7 melds HTML5 with enterprise apps
New release arrives with GlassFish, NetBeans support
 breaking news
'Office Facebook' firm Tibbr wants you to PAY for mobe-meetings app
Great idea. Punters won't cough for it though
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
PM Cameron calls for modern, programmable computers! (We think)
IT education musings to G8 chiefs to mystify IT industry
Apple at WWDC: Sleek new iOS, death of the big cats, pint-sized Mac Pro
CEO Cook: 'The biggest change to iOS since the introduction of the iPhone'
Chrome and Firefox are planet-wreckers, IE cuddles dolphins
Microsoft-commissioned study finds IE sucks less power than rival browsers