WTO could be used to abolish censorship say researchers
Free speech trade now
What you need to know about cloud backup
The World Trade Organisation has raised the delicious possibility of using its regulations to smite companies that censor their citizens' access to the internet - before admitting that this approach is unlikely to get very far.
A paper produced by the European Centre for International Political Economy observes that the internet and e-commerce has largely grown up outside the regulatory framework painfully built up to police international trade via the WTO.
But, the researchers argue, much internet activity can arguably be covered by the rules either due to the site selling something - eg, the selling of content or CDs, DVDs etc. - or because content is being supported by advertising.
While the trade regulations rarely explicitly mention online businesses, the researchers say that actions by governments to block or censor internet activity could be construed as breaching these rules.
As the researchers say: "This paper suggests that many WTO members are legally obliged to permit an unrestricted supply of cross-border internet services."
Of course, the WTO is there to regulate trade, not political, moral or religious dissent, and the researchers also detail the ways in which "repressive" regimes might defend themselves in front of a WTO panel.
For example, a richer government with technical nous, let's say China, might fall foul of the WTO if it imposes blanket blocks on material it finds objectionable. However the implication is that more "selective" blocks might get past the panels.
"Less resourceful countries, without means of filtering more selectively, and with a censorship based on moral and religious grounds, might be able to defend such bands in the WTO," they add.
The researchers accept that the WTO would remain a "weak" option for abolishing censorship, and accept that targeted countries may simply withdraw from their obligations.
The researchers also make the point that it is governments that raise issues with the WTO. Therefore any group or company wanting to highlight censorship by a given government, first has to convince its own government to raise the issue at the WTO. This will surely be no problem - as long as the target country doesn't have something desirable, such as, say, oil, gas, wood, rare minerals, diamonds, precious metals, etc.
Still, we can be sure that censorship's days are likely to be numbered in Belgium and Iceland. ®
COMMENTS
Legally dubious
This report is ridiculous. The WTO allows countries to ban things they don't like, as long as they apply the same rule to imports as to home-grown products and services. This is why e.g. the USA can ban gambling (but it can't ban foreign internet gambling while allowing home-grown gambling) and Arab countries can ban alcohol. Therefore, the WTO only becomes an issue of China is banning people from reading foreign sites about Tiananmen square but is happy to allow Chinese websites to report the atrocities, and I really don't see that happening. Governments are far more likely to censor domestic content than foreign imports, and there's nothing the WTO can do about that.
WTO cares?
The WTO is there to bash the US and syphon employment from the west to captive labour in the east. Perhaps even to drop kick any kind of pollution control.
The WTO would never do anything like being moral and actually use its power in this way.
Selective Application
Yes, use it to bludgeon China by all means. Just ensure you turn the other cheek when the "nice countries" in the West implement their increasingly draconian filtering schemes though.
It's all for the sake of the chillren of course.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
