Feeds

Sun and Apache: the Java scars that endure

Neutrality gets you so far

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

ApacheCon 09 Apache Software Foundation (ASF) pioneers have toasted 10 years of independence and successful code development at their annual conference in California.

Speakers who spun-up the project in its early days celebrated building a community that has stayed (mostly) friendly and dedicated to the ideal of building open-source code. Also it’s a group that’s remained beyond the control of tech vendors.

To mark the anniversary, ASF announced the Subversion open-source version-control project has joined ASF, to become a top-level project.

Not that things have been this harmonious - or pain free.

Among the scars aired Wednesday: Early work on XML that was dogged by politics as Java, middleware, and server rivals IBM and Sun Microsystems butted heads.

Ted Leung, previously the ASF’s vice president of XML and employed by IBM 10 years back but now a Sun principal engineer, said: “We had two corporations included - IBM and Sun and there was quite a bit of politicking going backwards and forth.”

Leung said he spent a year and a half after leaving IBM to try bring IBM and Sun together in the group.

IBM is now an enthusiastic ASF member as it has come to realize the benefits to its business of Linux and open source. Sun’s history with ASF is still an open wound.

The problem is the Harmony Project, Apache’s implementation of Java Standard Edition (Java SE) that’s been enthusiastically backed by IBM.

Sun’s refused to release Java Test Compatibility Kits (TCKs) under a license ASF considers friendly. The TCKs would let ASF certify Project Harmony as compliant with Sun's official specification. Without the TCK, the ASF cannot prove to customers Harmony conforms.

Speaking to The Reg immediately after ApacheCon panel Wednesday, co-founder and vice president of the Apache HTTP Server Project Roy Fielding said Sun and its potential new owner Oracle have both refused to discuss the subject of TCK licensing.

Both are under a complete and self-impose lock down, refusing to say anything that might be remotely construed as a forward looking statement on Oracle’s plans for Sun.

Sun’s silence is the fag end to a painful history with the ASF.

After years of simmering anger on the open sourcing of Java, Sun finally let the code go in 2006 and proceeded to cover itself in glory. The company didn’t release the TCKs, however, and a year after the ASF lambasted Sun publicly in an open letter for holding back Harmony and for damaging the credibility of its Java Community Process (JCP).

The ASF this year was one of just two JCP members that voted against the latest edition of the Java Enterprise Edition (Java EE) specification. The move was a protest over the still-unresolved TCK issue.

Flattering his own organization Wednesday, Apache co-founder and chairman Jim Jagielski took a swipe at the JCP, which Sun dominates.

“I think we are this neutral base...we are not doing it for an ulterior motive, to advance a specific technology or agenda or company - we are letting the community pull us along,” Jagielski said. “We are not representing anything other than what’s going on in the community, and [we are] not representing a company or superset of the company.”

According to Leung, meanwhile, it’s the ASF’s inability to be bought that’s guaranteed it’s reputation as a genuinely independent organization – unlike the JCP.

In the past Sun’s tried to spend money to join ASF only to be told its seats are not for sale. Apache only accepts members based on merit - the code they contribute to projects - so companies can’t buy membership or board seats

Of late, ASF has started taking sponsorship money from Microsoft leading to periodic claims that “somebody” now “owns” the ASF.

According to Leung, the fact 70 ASF projects exist proves people believe the group is genuinely neutral. “One of the reasons we’ve been successful is we have a place where people with differences of interest can come together and work,” Leung said. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
'Windows 9' LEAK: Microsoft's playing catchup with Linux
Multiple desktops and live tiles in restored Start button star in new vids
Not appy with your Chromebook? Well now it can run Android apps
Google offers beta of tricky OS-inside-OS tech
New 'Cosmos' browser surfs the net by TXT alone
No data plan? No WiFi? No worries ... except sluggish download speed
Greater dev access to iOS 8 will put us AT RISK from HACKERS
Knocking holes in Apple's walled garden could backfire, says securo-chap
NHS grows a NoSQL backbone and rips out its Oracle Spine
Open source? In the government? Ha ha! What, wait ...?
Google extends app refund window to two hours
You now have 120 minutes to finish that game instead of 15
Intel: Hey, enterprises, drop everything and DO HADOOP
Big Data analytics projected to run on more servers than any other app
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.