Feeds

SGI-Rackable combo posts big revenue gains

And a whopping loss

High performance access to file storage

On the revenue front, the acquisition of the carcass of supercomputer maker Silicon Graphics by niche hyperscale server maker Rackable Systems looks like it was a good idea as the combination, now known as Silicon Graphics, closed out its first quarter of fiscal 2010. But in terms of profits - or the lack thereof - it doesn't look like such a good idea at all.

In the quarter ended September 25, the new and improved SGI posted sales of $100.1m, up 53.8 per cent compared to Rackable's pretty dismal solo quarter a year ago, when it saw sales drop by 25.2 per cent to $65.3m and booked a $6m loss. But in the first quarter of the new SGI's fiscal 2010, the combined company saw its costs rise on all fronts, forcing it to book an $18.5m operating loss and after some adjustments a net loss of $17.6m.

In the year-ago quarter, Rackable was sitting on $184.6m in cash, but was staring at the economic meltdown and the chilling effect it had on the kind of hyperscale deployments Rackable made a business out of. It certainly didn't help matters that HP, Dell, and IBM began peddling more dense, exotic, and energy-efficient servers to customers who might have otherwise considered Rackable's products.

So you can see why Rackable might have wanted to make a lateral move into the HPC space by acquiring the SGI assets and customer base on the relative cheap once it went into bankruptcy. But now the new SGI is sitting on only $112.7m in cash, having burned money to buy the old SGI's assets and do some restructuring. Investors have generally looked favorably on the Rackable-SGI combo, and its stock has been on the rise since March after a big collapse last fall when the server business went into a tailspin. SGI's shares ended the day at $6 a pop, giving the company a market capitalization of $181m, about 13 percent lower than a year ago.

Instead of buying SGI's assets in May for $42.5m, Rackable could have taken itself private between last fall and through the early spring; but alas, that is no longer an option.

In Wednesday's earnings announcement, the new SGI didn't offer much in the way of insight into what was selling during its first fiscal quarter.

"SGI delivered a solid quarter in terms of revenue, gross margin and operations," said Mark Barrenechea, SGI's president and chief executive officer, in a statement. "Operationally, our integration is ahead of schedule in most key areas. We also introduced new products that could expand our addressable market by over $1.7 billion while investing for long-term growth."

Jim Wheat, SGI's chief financial officer, said in a call with Wall Street analysts that the company was starting to provide non-GAAP revenue and profit figures because for the first time in its history, Rackable (as the new SGI) has a considerable amount of revenue coming from software sales, which have to be spread over future quarters. Hardware sales are booked immediately. On a non-GAAP basis, the new SGI had revenues of $122.7m in the quarter and had a loss of only $2.8m in the quarter.

Wheat added that SGI had only one customer that represented more than 10 per cent of its quarterly non-GAAP sales, and that was long-time customer Amazon. Sales into Internet service providers accounted for about a third of non-GAAP revenues in the quarter. And government and defense contractors accounted for about a quarter of sales. Educational and manufacturing companies accounted for another 23 per cent. Wheat said that 31 per cent the company's sales came from overseas during the quarter, with the remaining 69 per cent coming from the States.

While SGI is not providing revenue or profit guidance for the coming fiscal 2010 year because of the uncertainty in the global economy and the IT spending environment, Barrenechea said in the call that SGI was still comfortable with the non-GAAP figures it started using as fiscal 2009 ended, when it said that it expects sales for fiscal 2010 to be around $500m and gross margins in the range of 20 per cent or so. ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
High Fidelity Pure Audio – is this what your ears have been waiting for?
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
Sorry London, Europe's top tech city is Munich
New 'Atlas of ICT Activity' finds innovation isn't happening at Silicon Roundabout
Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon flying broadband-bot
Apple DOMINATES the Valley, rakes in more profit than Google, HP, Intel, Cisco COMBINED
Cook & Co. also pay more taxes than those four worthies PLUS eBay and Oracle
It may be ILLEGAL to run Heartbleed health checks – IT lawyer
Do the right thing, earn up to 10 years in clink
prev story

Whitepapers

Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
HP ArcSight ESM solution helps Finansbank
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.