Feeds

Sun aims for sky, shoots self in foot

Targets not acquired

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

As European regulators drag their feet on approving Oracle's $7.4bn acquisition of Sun Microsystems, the securities laws for public companies back home in the States compel Sun to still do its paperwork. Sun has dutifully sent out the proxy notices to shareholders telling them to mark their calendars for the annual shareholder meeting, and another note detailing the compensation packages of the top brass at the company.

Considering that Sun has had a difficult couple of years, has been trying to sell itself since last November and has laid off 8,000 employees in two rounds of layoffs in the past 12 months to try to get costs aligned with decreasing sales, it comes as no surprise that the compensation for Sun's executive suite has gone down. Sun would have to be a Wall Street bank for it to be otherwise. That said, the golden parachutes that these executives have and even their diminished pay and other compensation is pretty sweet for a bunch of people who are rarely talking the Sun talk these days to help peddle products.

According to the proxy statement just filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Sun will be hosting its annual shareholder's meeting on December 17 at Sun's Santa Clara campus in Silicon Valley, where stock holders will vote in a slate of directors for the Sun board and pick Ernst and Young as the company's auditors - standing operating procedure. If Oracle's deal pulls through before then, the Sun shareholder meeting is canceled, so only use pencil on your calendar rather than ink.

None of that is particularly interesting. The compensation packages and golden parachutes are, as is the stake that Sun's own executives have in the game. Scott McNealy, Sun's co-founder and chairman, has 17.3 million shares and options, giving him a 2.3 per cent stake of Sun and meaning that he will pocket $164.5m if the Oracle deal goes through and exercises 3.1 million in options before the end of December.

Sun's president and chief executive officer, Jonathan Schwartz, has 592,589 shares plus just under 1.5 million options, and if Schwartz exercises those options, then he stands to get $19.8m if the Oracle deal consummates. All told, Sun's top 21 executives have just under 16 million shares and options on another 6.9 million, giving them just over a three per cent stake in Sun - and a $217.5m stake in the outcome of the deal.

Incidentally, Barclays Global Investors has 37.6 million shares, which is five per cent of the outstanding shares, and that is worth $357.3m if the Oracle acquisition closes. Heaven only knows how much money Barclays kicked in to Sun's shares over the years and if its investment is underwater.

The proxy statement is interesting in that it details the financial targets that Sun set to calculate the compensation for Schwartz, and reveals that the company did not even come close. Part of that is due to the economic meltdown starting last summer, when Sun began its fiscal 2009; part of it is due to the rumors about the IBM deal in March and then the subsequent Oracle deal in April and all the uncertainty surrounding the deal; part of it is due to the uncertainty of Sun's products lines; and part of it is because Sun just has a lot more trouble selling servers and making money than it once used to.

Sun missed targets for all four quarters of fiscal 2009, as it turns out. The goal for the first quarter ended in September 2008 was for $3.21bn in sales and $180.9m in operating income, but Sun only brought in $2.99bn in sales and had a $72m operating loss. In fiscal Q2, when Schwartz had begun the acquisition dance with Big Blue, the goal was to have $3.71bn in sales and $453m in operating income; but Sun only brought in $3.22bn in sales and only $79m in operating profits.

The IBM deal only went public at the end of fiscal Q3, ended in March, so you can't blame that blown deal for the fact that sales were only $2.61bn and Sun booked an operating loss of $65m, compared to the CEO compensation bonus plan target of $3.43bn in sales and $253.3m in operating income. The fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 ended in June, when the chilling effects of the pending Oracle deal were in full effect, Sun was ridiculously below targets. The bonus plan for Schwartz called for Sun to have $3.94bn in sales and $557.3m in operating income; what actually happened is that Sun booked $2.63bn in sales and had an operating loss of $105m.

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Next page: Trick or treat?

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.