Feeds

Google sued for super-skinny Chrome polishing

I have a patent on your Courgette

Intelligent flash storage arrays

Mobilephoneware maker Red Bend Software has sued Google for patent infringement, claiming that the web giant's Chrome browser steps on an algorithmic patent it secured in 2003.

In tandem with its Israeli parent company - Red Bend Ltd. - the Massachusetts-based Red Bend Software filed its suit in federal court on Monday, accusing Google of infringing its patent on "a method for generating a compact difference result between an old program and a new program."

Red Bend uses this "differential compression algorithm" to rapidly push firmware updates onto mobile phones. Basically, the technology updates pieces of a remote software package without updating the whole thing.

Google's Chrome browser uses an update compression algorithm called "Courgette," and Red Bend contends that with this Zucchini algorithm, Google is willfully infringing on its patent. That willful bit means that Red Bend is seeking treble the damages. The company says that Google has known about the patent since early September. Presumably, that's when Red Bend sent the web giant a letter.

Since Google has open-sourced the Courgette code, Red Bend also says that its doing so induces infringement from others.

Google Chrome is based on the Google-created Chromium open-source browser project. Documentation on the Chromium site describes Courgette as a new differential compression algorithm - written by Google - for making Google Chrome updates "significantly smaller."

"We want smaller updates because it narrows the window of vulnerability. If the update is a tenth of the size, we can push ten times as many per unit of bandwidth," the site says. "We have enough users that this means more users will be protected earlier. A secondary benefit is that a smaller update will work better for users who don't have great connectivity.

"Rather than push put a whole new 10MB update, we send out a diff that takes the previous version of Google Chrome and generates the new version."

Red Bend didn't immediately respond to our request for comment. And Google declined to comment. "We haven't yet been served, so we can't comment until we've had a chance to review the complaint," a spokesman said.

You can see Red Bend's differential compression patent here (US Patent 6,546,552). ®

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
Be real, Apple: In-app goodie grab games AREN'T FREE – EU
Cupertino stands down after Euro legal threats
Download alert: Nearly ALL top 100 Android, iOS paid apps hacked
Attack of the Clones? Yeah, but much, much scarier – report
You stupid BRICK! PCs running Avast AV can't handle Windows fixes
Fix issued, fingers pointed, forums in flames
Microsoft: Your Linux Docker containers are now OURS to command
New tool lets admins wrangle Linux apps from Windows
Bada-Bing! Mozilla flips Firefox to YAHOO! for search
Microsoft system will be the default for browser in US until 2020
Facebook, working on Facebook at Work, works on Facebook. At Work
You don't want your cat or drunk pics at the office
Soz, web devs: Google snatches its Wallet off the table
Killing off web service in 3 months... but app-happy bonkers are fine
prev story

Whitepapers

Choosing cloud Backup services
Demystify how you can address your data protection needs in your small- to medium-sized business and select the best online backup service to meet your needs.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.