Feeds

Overland hurls PwC auditors overboard

They said howwid things about our viability

Boost IT visibility and business value

Overland Storage management seems to have taken exception to PricewaterhouseCoopers' auditing of its accounts and fired the firm.

For the past two financial years PwC has added a stern warning to the accounts, saying that there was substantial doubt about Overland's ability to continue as a going concern. While even accountants are entitled to a view about the state of the struggling business, Overland was upset because PwC didn't actually identify any specific factor in the accounts that led them to that conclusion.

Presumably PwC was expressing a view based on such business events as Overland avoiding running out of cash by factoring arrangements, repeated staff headcount reductions, Nasdaq delisting, declining revenues and losses. Overland's thinking is that, if so, it shouldn't have.

The upset was detailed in an 8-K SEC filing that said PwC had been dismissed on October 12. Overland stated that, during the period of the two financial years:

There were no disagreements between our company and PwC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to PwC’s satisfaction, would have caused PwC to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report for such years; and there were no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

The subject matter of the disagreement was about Overland's ability to continue as a going concern. Overland now thinks PwC shouldn't have expressed such doubts without backing them up. It sent PwC a letter saying this and asking it to send a letter to the SEC saying whether or not it agreed with Overland's point.

Connoisseurs of brevity will appreciate PwC's SEC letter:

We have read the statements made by Overland Storage, Inc. (copy attached), which we understand will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Item 4.01 of Form 8-K, as part of the Company’s Form 8-K report dated October 12, 2009. We agree with the statements concerning our Firm in such Form 8-K.

Moss Adams is replacing PwC, and might be wise to watch what it says. ®

Build a business case: developing custom apps

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Kaspersky backpedals on 'done nothing wrong, nothing to fear' blather
Founder (and internet passport fan) now says privacy is precious
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup
Learn why inSync received the highest overall rating from Druva and is the top choice for the mobile workforce.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.