Feeds

Lloyds TSB's online banking system shows no love for Firefox

Only supports IE and, er, Netscape Navigator

Security for virtualized datacentres

Many Lloyds TSB business customers who use Firefox as their default browser are currently unable to access their online banking accounts.

Several readers have contacted The Register telling us that the service is throwing up an error message when they attempt to logon to the site via the world's second most popular browser.

Forums are also abuzz with complaints about what appears to be a sudden lack of compatibility for Firefox on the Lloyds TSB website.

"Sorry we are unable to progress with your request 139212 - You entered one or more unexpected punctuation characters such as \ ; " ! * ~ ^ < > . These are not permitted. Please hit the back button and try again," is the error message many have reported over the past few days.

One El Reg reader and Lloyds TSB customer told us he had contacted the website's internet banking helpdesk to try and find out why the firm was suddenly shunning Firefox. Lloyds TSB responded by saying the bank doesn't currently support the Firefox browser, and instead advised the customer to use Microsoft's Internet Explorer.

Lloyds TSB, not a Firefox lover

Lloyds TSB, not a Firefox lover

Despite the obvious technical cockup affecting an unknown number of its customers, some have claimed that Lloyds TSB has so far failed to respond adequately to the problem.

A spokeswoman at the banking giant said that Lloyds does support some flavours of Firefox, but a quick look on the firm's browser checker tool seems to suggest otherwise. It clearly states what the online banking service does and doesn't support, and it would appear that most browsers are shunned by the Lloyds TSB online banking system.

"Your browser was detected as being unsuitable for use with Lloyds TSB online," reads a message that shows zero love for Mozilla's Firefox, but gives the thumbs up to Internet Explorer (understandable given it's the leading browser) and Netscape Navigator (which is a bit odd, really). ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.