The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds
  • print
  • alert

Intel claims that, on average, Moorestown will consume less than half the power that Menlow does, but the real boost comes to the amount of power it uses up while on stand-by - one fiftieth of Menlow's idle power consumption, the company claims.

Intel Moorestown

Moorestown's 'fine-grain' power management

Menlow consumes 1.6W in stand-by, putting Moorestown at around 32mW.

That, Intel hopes, will be sufficient to allow, say, a high-end smartphone to run for a day or two between charges, depending on usage.

The level of stand-by power consumption is central to Moorestown's design philosophy. And it's not only about keeping the power loss right down while the host device isn't doing anything. Moorestown was also designed to get as much work done in as little time as possible in order to get the device back into that ultra-low power idle state as soon as it can.

Lincroft's contribution to that is manifold. The CPU core, which is essentially an existing 'Silverthorne' Atom, is accompanied in the package by a 2D/3D graphics engine, a memory controller, a video decoder and encoder, and the display controller.

All of these components are managed by an on-chip Power Management Unit (PMU) that can completely switch off any of them that aren't being used at a given moment. Moorestown uses pre-programmed power usage policies that govern what gets switched off and when. If the handset's screen is off, for example, the display controller, video and graphics engines can be powered down.

Intel Moorestown

Moorestown's power management systems' interplay

If you're listening to music, off goes the CPU too while Langwell's audio engine handles the work. Alongside that component, Langwell is home to Moorestown's embedded, SDIO, USB, NAND Flash - ie. storage - and camera controllers. There's no PCI Express - that's too PC-centric and not needed here, says Intel, though it will be a part of Pine Trail's 'Tiger Point' I/O chip - with all other peripherals, such as Intel's own Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and GPS module, 'Evans Peak', connecting over the SDIO bus. Intel has added a CE-ATA bus too, presumably with an eye on set-top box opportunites.

While Lincroft is fabbed at 45nm, Langwell is a 65nm part, though their packages are effectively identical in size.

Latest Comments

Lets be positive

Lets not denigrate them too much - pushing these technologies into the more powerful processors used in real laptops should boost battery life no end.

0
0

Not in a mobile.

Shouldn't really be in a laptop either. ARM shits all over it.

0
0

Intel never were very good

..at power management. And still aren't.

0
0

Dynamic overclocking?

Sounds freaking dangerous to me. Can I opt out of having a heart monitor running this? Ta.

0
0

Forget it

As AC has siad, these things are just too big and power hunger and expensive relative to ARM parts out there.

Sure, they will improve in time, but process improvement lifts all ships and ARM parts will also improve.

Perhaps they can sell these into tablets etc, but they'll need some significant magic to get them anywhere near phones.

0
0

More from The Register

Android is a mess and needs sprucing up, admits chief
Can Google really fix it? It isn't in control any more
New Lumia 925: This, loyalists, is the BIG ONE you've waited for
Nokia veep drills high-end master plan for El Reg
Android device? Ooohhhh, you mean a Samsung phone
Koreans nabbed nearly all the Q1 profits – more even than Google
Review: HP Pavilion 14 Chromebook
All roads lead to Chrome?
Borked your iDevice? Pay EVEN MORE to have it fixed by Applecare
Or scream at their hapless techies on their forums
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner
MIT takes battery-powered robot cheetah for a gallop
Biomimetic big cat needs no power cord, just a walker