The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

The tools of the trade: Cutting edge or a bit embarrassing?

Get your skills on

  • print
  • alert

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Workshop Do the phrases ‘cutting edge’ and ‘your IT shop’ constitute a contradiction in terms, or do you work in a sleek and streamlined vision of sci-fi IT?

When we asked you about this last year we got the impression that for most organisations it was more the former than the latter. That’s not to say you told us things were falling around your ears, just that it takes quite a lot of effort to keep your IT systems on the straight and narrow.

What came across loud and clear from the research was that it wasn’t so much the tools you used that were causing things to be less than optimal, but the gaps between them. Where the tools and skills exist everything tends to run smoothly.

However, it doesn’t matter how good the individual widgets are when it’s the view across the infrastructure that really matters – particularly if we’re trying to manage the capabilities we provide to the business as ‘services’. I say ‘if’, because the levels of fragmentation we currently work with don’t make it easy to get that ‘end to end view’ of a service. So maybe it’s a moot point, today at least.

Fig 1

Some unexpected findings emerged when we explored this idea of fragmentation further. The difference in the level of burden experienced by IT departments that consider their IT management environments to be highly co-ordinated, versus those that do not, isn’t nearly as clear cut as we might have thought. We also found that some organisations were still suffering despite having made efforts to the contrary.

The bottom line, we found, was that regardless of the approach taken to IT management, many organisations are not well placed to address new demands placed on IT. This is linked as much to the overall shortcomings of the IT management tools and solutions in place, as much as it is to individual strategies and buying criteria followed over time.

We’re not sure there are any easy answers when it comes to filling in the gaps. Theorists talk about maturity, and to be sure there is always further an organisation can go, but such models don’t really capture the complexities of managing the IT jungle, which is as much about staving off the encroaching chaos as moving things forward. One of the things we’d like to hear from you about is how you manage to strike a balance, and the efforts you find yourselves having to go to in order to achieve this.

The bottom line: is investment to improve ‘service management’ seen as a strategic priority in your organisation or are you reliant on coming up with your own tactical work-arounds, in a more reactive manner? Are you big on process, or getting the tools you need – particularly in the Current Economic Climate (TM)? For example, one of the Register readers told us he was using free tools from Spiceworks for his asset management requirements.

We know that free stuff and personal favourites have always been part and parcel of the IT practitioner’s toolbox. Are they now a prerequisite in the absence of real investment or are they actually pretty good? As usual, we’d love to hear from you. ®

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Latest Comments

NetXMS...

...we couldn't get Managemet to part with the tool we wanted, as monitoring fell either under ther server guys or netowrk guys, neith of which could understand the requirements we needed (Telephony guys) and could be bothered as they had enough problems of there own.

Then I discovered NetXMS, now not are we monitoring our systems, other fragmented bits of the department are looking at it as well, so they can get their areas better monitored.

Hell we even let the network & server guys know about issues before their £50k stuff alerts them.

Yes it's harder to set up and configure, but once set blows away much of the so called "high end" stuff.

http://www.netxms.org/

0
0

Got annoyed with shoddy vendor functionality,

so have had to write my own posix scripts for the following,...

- backup tape bar-graphs (shows usage across a night)

- historical backups data capture to text file (history is purged after the backup expires)

- media utilisation reports (showing % utilisation on tapes)

- restore scripts (builds command line for restores of databases, allows ops to run them)

- capacity / growth monitoring (detecting data areas / tablespaces over % limits)

- printer queue performance (checking printers are sending through X jobs per minute)

No one tool seems to do it all, but I am lucky in that I have time to customise with scripts.

One thing that helps any environment is the setting of standards before implementation, which means consistency, configurability and expandability, and less jiggling of tools, shelfware and "sprawl" of tools.

0
0

More from The Register

Bjarne Again: Hallelujah for C++
Plus: Now officially OK to admit you never used STL algorithms
Interwebs taunt Sir Jony over Apple eye candy makeover
Hey Ive, Ive... add more unicorns, willya?
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
Apple: iOS7 dayglo Barbie makeover is UNFINISHED - report
Plus: You don't like the icons? Blame marketing
Red Hat to ditch MySQL for MariaDB in RHEL 7
So long, Oracle! Don't let the door hit you on the way out
Shy? Socially inadequate? Fiddling with your phone could help
App 'tells the brutal truth' about social inadequates' chatup lines
Java EE 7 melds HTML5 with enterprise apps
New release arrives with GlassFish, NetBeans support
 breaking news
'Office Facebook' firm Tibbr wants you to PAY for mobe-meetings app
Great idea. Punters won't cough for it though
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
PM Cameron calls for modern, programmable computers! (We think)
IT education musings to G8 chiefs to mystify IT industry