Feeds

Adaptec tears strips off Steel Partners

Abusive acquirer seeking to steal control

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Adaptec's board is telling shareholders that investor Steel Partners is an abusive acquirer, that has reduced shareholder value and wants control of Adaptec for scary purposes.

Steel Parters is a hedge fund that invested in Adaptec in 2007, then started a fight for board influence, resulting in three seats on Adaptec's board and its chairmanship. After its chairman was removed earlier this month, it now wants shareholders to remove Adaptec's CEO, Sundi Sundaresh from the board. The board itself wants shareholders to reject the Steel Partner's proposal and agree the current strategy that Adaptec is pursuing.

In its latest letter to shareholders, the board, under new chairman Joseph Kennedy, says Adaptec's current strategy of focussing on improving its RAID controller products is working, and that Adaptec's financial situation has improved despite the recession. The message here is that shareholders can trust the board and management to lead the company properly.

Not so Steel Partners, with the board letter telling shareholders that a Japanese Judge has branded Steel Partners as an "abusive acquirer," indicating it's not to be trusted. The letter adds:

Steel Partners currently has three designees on the Adaptec Board, Jack Howard, John Quicke and John Mutch. A fourth director, Lawrence Ruisi, was recommended by Steel Partners to serve on our Board... If Steel Partners' proposals succeed, these four directors together will constitute a majority of the reduced seven-person Board, giving Steel Partners effective control through these individuals. Do not let Steel Partners take control of your Board!

They also point out that the Steel Partners directors are performing a bit of a U-turn as:

All of Steel Partners' representatives voted 'yes' on the financial plans they now criticize and 'yes' on our 2008 acquisition of Aristos Logic, which Steel now disingenuously cites as a reason for its actions.

Steel Partners has a "value-destroying agenda for Adaptec," they claim, and wants to sell Adaptec into a depressed market, probably because it needs the cash to bolster up its hedge fund, which has performed badly in the recession, and also because Steel Partners wants to use Adaptec cash for its own purposes:

We believe Steel Partners' plan is to turn Adaptec into a corporate shell to be used to enter into a wholly new line of business unrelated to Adaptec's current business... In discussions with the Company's management, principals at Steel Partners indicated that they see Adaptec as a ready source of cash - over $350 million - that would allow them to pursue other investment opportunities in a range of industries. Whatever Steel Partners' goal is, they should not conceal that from you.

Adaptec's board letter also publicises Steel Partners' own poor performance:

Steel has destroyed the wealth of its own investors as well. According to The Wall Street Journal, 'the fund's 2008 decline was double the average hedge-fund loss and worse than that of Standard & Poor's 500-stock index.' According to Reuters in May 2009, 'The Steel Partners II fund fell by more than 40 per cent last year and then dropped 18 per cent in the first quarter [of 2009].' Not surprisingly, these poor results have embroiled Steel Partners in litigation after investors in its fund sued when Steel Partners refused to give their money back... In order to fulfil the redemption requests from investors, Steel Partners II was forced this summer to reduce - by approximately half - its holdings in Adaptec. The price of Adaptec, not surprisingly, fell sharply... Today Steel is citing that price drop - with no hint of irony or embarrassment - as one of the reasons it wants more control of Adaptec.

In summary the board's letter says:

If Steel's proposals are successful, this would truly be an astounding summer for Steel Partners: it would have cut its ownership stake (to just over 10 per cent of Adaptec stock) and obtained significant control over the future of Adaptec - all without paying you any control premium.

Adaptec's board wants the Steel Partners' proposals to be viewed as rubbish ideas from an aggressive hedge fund investor with a lousy record that will destroy shareholder value. In other words, don't let Steel Partners get control of Adaptec for a steal. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
Oracle hires former SAP exec for cloudy push
'We know Larry said cloud was gibberish, and insane, and idiotic, but...'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.