Feeds

Seagate reveals 1TB FreeAgent

But it will be too fat to fit inside your laptop

Security for virtualized datacentres

Confirming a channel leak, Seagate has announced a 1TB FreeAgent Go, but said the drive will not be used in its notebook product line.

Western Digital announced its 1TB Scorpio Blue 2.5-inch drive recently. Up until now the portable FreeAgent Go products have been limited to 500GB capacity, with their 2-platter, 2.5-inch drives. There will be three new models with 750GB, 880GB, and 1TB capacity points, using three platters. This is a "fat drive", according to Jon Van Bronkhorst, Seagate consumer products' executive director, as it has a 15mm depth, with Seagate using an existing enterprise chassis.

The platters spin at 5400rpm, with no news about any forthcoming 7,200rpm speed. Bronkhorst said the 3-platter drive: "will be sold only to the external drive market; never internal." It is too deep for that.

But he did reveal that "we're working on a 7mm (depth), single platter drive."

Bronkhorst didn't elaborate on the markets for such an ultra-thin 2.5-inch drive, but he is in Seagate's consumer division and it would suit embedded applications that have a restricted depth available. However, mobile internet devices such as the rumoured tablets and existing ultra-thin notebooks might also enjoy having a thin hard disk drive today, even if it could deliver just 330GB capacity.

The next 2.5-inch platter capacity point will almost certainly be 500GB. Bronkhorst says Seagate could stretch the current 320-333GB/platter areal density, but not that far, and it will be better to wait for the next natural platter density level. We might think about products using 500GB 2.5-inch platters appearing in 2011, possibly even the back end of 2010. That would give us 1TB notebook drives with a 9.5mm depth.

Verbatim has announced a 500GB InSight portable drive with an E Ink-type Always On display. Users can thus label the drive to indicate its contents; music, videos or photos for example. Asked about similar FreeAgent labelling Bronkhorst carefully said: "No FreeAgent product has been announced with an E Ink display." At least, it hasn't yet.

Bronkhorst didn't say when the bigger FreeAgents would be available or mention pricing, but did talk about the coming holiday season, so that's probably another hint. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
Symantec backs out of Backup Exec: Plans to can appliance in Jan
Will still provide support to existing customers
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.