Feeds

EMC offers cascading replication

Hopes to make lugging boxes of tapes a thing of the past

7 Elements of Radically Simple OS Migration

Aiming to knock another nail in tape's coffin, EMC has improved its Data Domain replication capability to chip away at another tape advantage.

Many data centres ship tapes between sites for disaster recovery (DR), with important data centres protected by two other sites and with remote data centres protected by a central one. Replicating data across network links between data centres is often done on a point-to-point basis, making it harder to protect a data centre with two DR sites.

EMC's Data Domain unit has added cascaded replication to its Replicator software, which enables the transfer of deduped data over low-bandwidth WAN links for disaster recovery-type purposes. The cascading means customers can extend replication of de-duped data to a third destination or to additional offsite locations.

The software now supports up to 180-to-1 remote site fan-in to a single controller for expanded automated cross-site deduplication. EMC says it also has up to 100 per cent faster directory replication throughput using optimised, multi-stream replication.

EMC cites Brian Babineau, an ESG senior analyst, who says: "According to our 2009 spending survey, the top storage investment enterprises plan to make is in replication for offsite data protection. It is clear that companies want to shift from transporting backup tapes as the primary means of moving data between multiple sites, so long as they can find an affordable disk alternative."

For customers that prefer to stay with tape, EMC will supply tape products sourced through Quantum.

NetApp has also been busy separately on the replication front. It has added compression to its SnapMirror thin replication product and claims customers can improve network bandwidth efficiency by up to 70 per cent. Bandwidth requirements for Exchange can be reduced by 33 per cent, Microsoft Home Directory by 63 per cent, and Oracle Database by 72 per cent. These numbers are based on NetApp's own testing. ®

Best practices for enterprise data

More from The Register

next story
Sysadmin Day 2014: Quick, there's still time to get the beers in
He walked over the broken glass, killed the thugs... and er... reconnected the cables*
VMware builds product executables on 50 Mac Minis
And goes to the Genius Bar for support
Multipath TCP speeds up the internet so much that security breaks
Black Hat research says proposed protocol will bork network probes, flummox firewalls
Auntie remains MYSTIFIED by that weekend BBC iPlayer and website outage
Still doing 'forensics' on the caching layer – Beeb digi wonk
Microsoft's Euro cloud darkens: US FEDS can dig into foreign servers
They're not emails, they're business records, says court
Microsoft says 'weird things' can happen during Windows Server 2003 migrations
Fix coming for bug that makes Kerberos croak when you run two domain controllers
Cisco says network virtualisation won't pay off everywhere
Another sign of strain in the Borg/VMware relationship?
prev story

Whitepapers

7 Elements of Radically Simple OS Migration
Avoid the typical headaches of OS migration during your next project by learning about 7 elements of radically simple OS migration.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Solving today's distributed Big Data backup challenges
Enable IT efficiency and allow a firm to access and reuse corporate information for competitive advantage, ultimately changing business outcomes.
A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?