Feeds

SGI births smaller baby super

Resurrecting the ghost of Octane

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Silicon Graphics, like Sun Microsystems, got its start as a supplier of technical workstations for nerds, and the new SGI - a combination of the old, bankrupt SGI and the niche server maker Rackable Systems - wants to do what Sun hasn't: get back into the workstation game in a serious way.

Today, such a machine is not called a workstation, but rather a personal supercomputer. The idea behind both boxes is fundamentally the same, despite 25 years of history: get a powerful machine in the hands of a single user with a budget they can afford and without requiring the approval of an IT department.

In August, shortly after closing the acquisition of SGI's assets and putting the SGI name on the combined company, SGI rolled out its combined product roadmap and then rejiggered Rackable's CloudRack cookie sheet servers with a CloudRack X2 variant that was shrunken version of the CloudRack machines, which came in half-rack and full-rack variants. The CloudRackX2, says Geoffrey Noer, senior director of product marketing at the new SGI, was aimed at departments that needed a workgroup cluster. The CloudRack X2s, which launched in early August, offered up to 216 X64 cores with some two switches and three power supplies in a 14U rack on wheels. This is not exactly perceived as a workstation, and its price was surely well above the discretionary budget level. If the CloudRack X2 was to bridge the gap between a two-socket, dual video card PC-style workstation and a rack of clustered servers, it was a bridge too far. The real bridge, it turns out, is the Octane III machine announced today by SGI.

The Octane III is being billed as the personal supercomputer, and it comes to market 16 years after SGI's popular MIPS/Irix Indigo workstations rolled out; the original two-socket Octanes and their funky tower cases came out in 1996, and were beefed up with the Octane2 in 2000. The interesting thing about the Octanes was that they had a crossbar switch architecture, called Crossbow, instead of a system bus, a kind of point-to-point interconnect that was more widely commercialized by Advanced Micro Devices as HyperTransport. It is ironic, in that sad IT definition of irony, that SGI had the right ideas so long ago, ideas that Intel is only getting to market with the QuickPath Interconnect architecture of its Nehalem family of chips this year. The Octanes ran both Irix and Linux.

The Octane III chassis is 12.5 inches wide, 27.5 inches high, and 26.1 inches deep. The system has been designed to be quiet enough to use in an office environment, although it is hard to imagine how this can be the case in an 80-core system. But, that's what Noer said it was, so if you get one and it is loud, you know who to send the complaints to.

You can get the Octane III personal supercomputer in three different configurations, and the first is not substantially different from a two-socket workstation you might build yourself or buy from Hewlett-Packard or Dell. The OC3-TY11 is set up as a high-end graphics workstation that can has a motherboard mounted vertically in the chassis that supports two of Intel's quad-core Xeon 5500 "Nehalem EP" processors.

This machine has 18 DDR3 memory slots, for a maximum of 144 GB of main memory. The board has twin Gigabit Ethernet NICs and fast PCI-Express x16 slots for sporting two graphics cards from nVidia (the Quadro FX1800, FX3800, FX4800, and FX5800 are all supported) or up to two Tesla C1060 graphics co-processors. (You can do one of each, of course, but picking two Tesla co-processors restricts you to the crap on-board graphics on the mobo).

For this workstation to be interesting, you really want more than two x16 slots. Anyway, the graphics workstation configuration of the Octane III can have four 3.5-inch SATA disks. Pricing was not available because the new SGI has inherited some bad habits from Rackable about not having list prices for its products.

The personal supercomputer configuration that is probably going to be most appealing to HPC customers is the OC3-10TY12, which puts CloudRack cookie sheet trays with ten two-socket Xeon 5500 servers plus a Gigabit Ethernet or InfiniBand switch (either dual or quad data rate speeds) into the chassis. Because of the power and cooling issues involved with cramming ten two-socket servers into the pedestal chassis, SGI can only use the Xeon L5520 processors, which have a 60 watt power envelope and which run at 2.26 GHz. If you don't fully load the machine, you can use faster and hotter 95 watt Xeon 5500 parts in the boards.

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Next page: Mucho Mobo

More from The Register

next story
IT crisis looming: 'What if AWS goes pop, runs out of cash?'
Public IaaS... something's gotta give - and it may be AWS
Linux? Bah! Red Hat has its eye on the CLOUD – and it wants to own it
CEO says it will be 'undisputed leader' in enterprise cloud tech
BT claims almost-gigabit connections over COPPER WIRE
Just need to bring the fibre box within 19m ...
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
Hey, what's a STORAGE company doing working on Internet-of-Cars?
Boo - it's not a terabyte car, it's just predictive maintenance and that
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.