Feeds

Spinnaker vets win funds for Avere start-up

'Older, wiser and more battle scarred'

Boost IT visibility and business value

Avere, a new storage venture formed by Ron Bianchini and other Spinnaker veterans from NetApp, has gained $15m in Series A funding.

We expect a product announcement next month, one that will feature tiered solid state disk (SSD) and disk drive storage in a single product with a demand-driven aspect, presumably meaning it scales on demand.

The company has gained a Sales VP, Brian Gladden, described as a storage veteran and former NetApp colleague. This is not the Dell Chief Financial Officer Brian Gladden but the previous sales veep of Z Research Brian Gladden. Prior to Z Research, he ran the sales effort at Gear6 and previously served in a number of roles at NetApp including director of OEM sales.

The funding comes from Menlo Ventures and Norwest Venture Partners, which helped fund Spinnaker from its inception. In keeping with the enthusiasm needed by a man investing millions into a startup in a recession, Menlo Ventures MD John Jarve said: “It is with great delight that we rejoin forces to help build Avere. We believe it has the right team, the right technology and the right market focus.”

Bianchini, Avere's CEO and founder, said: "(This time around) we’re older, wiser and more battle scarred, but we’re still focused on our goal to bring game-changing storage solutions to the enterprise.”

Getting a product out of the door a year after start-up, combined with an announcement of $15m A-round funding a month before product announcement suggests the technology does not use Avere-developed hardware. If it did we might have expected previously-announced funding north of $30m and a two year-plus timescale. We might be looking here at software that uses commercially-available hardware, with the $15m needed for operating capital as Avere recruits staff and builds up a business infrastructure and initiates sales and marketing activities.

Of course we don't know product availability, so this is just guesswork. Still the timescale is short and the funding relatively small, both factors suggesting a software-based product. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
Docker kicks KVM's butt in IBM tests
Big Blue finds containers are speedy, but may not have much room to improve
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Gartner's Special Report: Should you believe the hype?
Enough hot air to carry a balloon to the Moon
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Dell The Man shrieks: 'We've got a Bitcoin order, we've got a Bitcoin order'
$50k of PowerEdge servers? That'll be 85 coins in digi-dosh
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.