Feeds

Aussie firewall nears death

What's that Skippy? It smells funny?

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

The Australian Senate Opposition leader Nick Minchin has joined the growing chorus of voices against Communications Minister Stephen Conroy's plans for mandatory ISP-level filtering.

The project may not yet be deceased, but it is without doubt on the critical list.

Senator Minchin said the government had not only failed to release the results of recent trials of internet filtering software, but it had also refused to come clean on what measures would determine whether the trial could be considered successful or not.

"Almost two years after coming to office with a plan to censor the internet, Senator Conroy has not even managed to release results for long overdue filtering trials, let alone come close to actually implementing this highly controversial policy," he said.

"Previous trials of filtering technology have exposed serious problems with both the over-blocking and under-blocking of content, and concerns also remain about the adverse impact a national filtering regime could have on internet speeds."

This follows criticism from ISPs that a wide-scale roll-out could still hit internet performance, irrespective of apparently favourable results from the filter testing. Asked in a radio interview to set out what results he would consider to constitute a successful outcome, Senator Conroy refused to do so.

Senator Minchin went on: "Huge doubts also continue to surround the type of content Labor wants to filter and how it will compile a black-list which would form the basis of its filtering regime."

This reflects a longstanding debate as to precisely what sort of content the filter is designed to block.

Opposition politicians have been slow to act because they sensed a widespread and genuine public sense that "something must be done" to control material available on the internet. This found parliamentary expression in a petition by Tasmanian Liberal senator Guy Barnett which attracted support from across all parties.

For a while, opponents of filtering were accused of being soft on child porn. However, government reluctance to come clean as to what it intends to filter, and the fact that some pronouncements have focused on blocking material that is merely "undesirable" – as opposed to strictly "illegal" – has left supporters of the firewall looking increasingly shifty on this issue.

Despite his forthright opposition, Senator Minchin has left himself an escape route, adding that the Coalition remains prepared to look at filtering if the government puts credible trial results into the public arena. ®

Bootnote

Debate on censorship issues in Australia has always been acrimonious, reflecting tensions between liberals and fundamentalists. In the 1950s, Australia was noted for its book banning, including Catcher in the Rye.

Today, controversy surrounds the absence of an RF18+ category for computer games, which means that many games that may quite legally be purchased elsewhere are simply unable to obtain classification in Australia.

Most recently, this ambivalence took a bizarre turn, as Queensland Police arrested a father of four on child-abuse charges for possession of a video that the Federal Government's own censors have now classified as MA15+ (suitable for aged 15 and above).

The man did not create the footage, of a man swinging a baby, but found it online and uploaded it to another website.

According to police, however, despite the apparent go-ahead from the State censor, simply viewing the images could result in a ten-year jail sentence. He faces trial next year. Our story on his arrest is here.

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Britain's housing crisis: What are we going to do about it?
Rent control: Better than bombs at destroying housing
Top beak: UK privacy law may be reconsidered because of social media
Rise of Twitter etc creates 'enormous challenges'
GCHQ protesters stick it to British spooks ... by drinking urine
Activists told NOT to snap pics of staff at the concrete doughnut
What do you mean, I have to POST a PHYSICAL CHEQUE to get my gun licence?
Stop bitching about firearms fees - we need computerisation
Ex US cybersecurity czar guilty in child sex abuse website case
Health and Human Services IT security chief headed online to share vile images
We need less U.S. in our WWW – Euro digital chief Steelie Neelie
EC moves to shift status quo at Internet Governance Forum
Oz biz regulator discovers shared servers in EPIC FACEPALM
'Not aware' that one IP can hold more than one Website
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.