Multitaskers: suckers for irrelevancy, easily distracted
Report fingers generation goldfish
Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software
A recent study implies it's not cool to brag about your skills as a multitasker.
This will comes as bad news to those of us who regularly consume multiple simultaneous media streams - texting while watching television, hopping between websites and IM, or coding while listening to Jay-Z.
You know who you are.
Specifically, the study concluded that media multitaskers have lower attention, memory, and task-switching abilities than folks who are more accustomed to doing one thing at a time.
As explained in the Stanford Report, the researchers who conducted the study gathered a group of about 100 students and divided them into two groups: those who regularly multitask among media and those who don't.
The researchers then gave each of the groups a battery of tests that compared them "along established cognitive control dimensions," in the words of the abstract of the study, published by the US National Academy of Sciences and called Cognitive control in media multitaskers.
According to researcher Clifford Nass, the testing showed that heavy multitaskers are "suckers for irrelevancy. Everything distracts them."
Not only were the multitaskers easily distracted, they also had poorer memories than the one-thing-at-a-timers. In memory testing, said the study's lead author, Eyal Ophir: "The low multitaskers did great. The high multitaskers were doing worse and worse the further they went along."
When the high multitaskers were given task-switching tests: "They couldn't help thinking about the task they weren't doing," Ophir said. "The high multitaskers are always drawing from all the information in front of them. They can't keep things separate in their minds."
As explained by co-author Anthony Wagner, high-multitaskers have poor information filters. "When they're in situations where there are multiple sources of information coming from the external world or emerging out of memory," he said, "they're not able to filter out what's not relevant to their current goal. That failure to filter means they're slowed down by that irrelevant information."
There is, of course, a chicken-and-egg question that the researchers didn't resolve through their testing: namely, as the Stanford Report put it: "Whether chronic media multitaskers are born with an inability to concentrate or are damaging their cognitive control by willingly taking in so much at once."
The authors of the study recognize that more research needs to be done to resolve that conundrum. But they're convinced that their study proves that heavy multitasking correlates quite directly with lowered brain function.
As Ophir said: "We kept looking for what they're better at, and we didn't find it." ®
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
COMMENTS
Test is so dumb.
Yes I can multitask well, and yes I get distracted easily. That can be a disadvantage, but that is one of the reasons WHY I can multitask well. When something needs my attention I am aware of it immediately and can deal with it accordingly. People who can't multitask tend to ignore all other stimuli (they don't even hear you talking to them while they're doing something else). That means they are good at doing one thing and not getting distracted, good for them, but they are not good at multitasking.
The report suggests that people who are only capable of focusing on one thing at a time are better at multitasking.
Everything about the test is dumb and unscientific. They draw conclusions that aren't there. I have heard this stupid report multiple times on various news and radio, and every time I can't believe how stupid it sounds. It's a "1+1 = 2, therefore 3+1 = banana" argument.
DOH!
I have to be careful, my wife is always telling me how good at Multi Tasking she is and in a fit of mischief i emailed her a link to this article.
Secondly the study said "We kept looking for what they're better at, and we didn't find it." well DUUUHHH! Multitaskers are better at Multitasking and whether Multitasking has any value is a moot point or not depending on whether my wife reads this.
I suspect i'll be monotasking for myself for a week or so now but it may have been worth it
@ AC 15:29 GMT
Thank you my good man.
New to me, that one.
Used to be called a spliff.
Getting old, I guess.

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Cloud storage: Lower cost and increase uptime
SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had