Feeds

Hewlett Foundation ponies up cash for Wikipedia

Someone has to pay for free content

The essential guide to IT transformation

The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, which handles the cash donated to various charities and good causes by one of the co-founders of Hewlett-Packard and his wife, has given Wikimedia, the non-profit behind the Wikipedia online encyclopedia, a $500,000 grant to improve itself.

Wikipedia is in no position to turn down cash from anyone, considering that Wikimedia is dedicated to open source and open content and relies on the kindness of strangers for not only its content, but also for the money to keep the Wikipedia project and numerous related projects afloat. But they must have been hoping for more help from the Hewlett Foundation, especially when you consider that Hewlett and his partner, Dave Packard, were engineers from Stanford University, created the original Silicon Valley IT startup, and had a lifelong dedication to education and the dissemination of news and information.

The Alfred P Sloan Foundation, created by a former president and chief executive officer of General Motors and which has an asset base of $1.8bn (sadly, much larger than GM itself), kicked in $3m this past March to Wikimedia to help it improve its operations and to expand its educational programs. The Sloan Foundation has a project called the Encyclopedia of Life, which is trying to create a web page dedicated to every known species on Earth. This effort is sponsored in conjunction with the MacArthur Foundation (which has $5.3bn in assets and which was created by the founder of Bankers Life and Casualty Company, John MacArthur, and his wife, Catherine), and is separate from the funds given to Wikipedia.

The Hewlett Foundation, which has $6.9bn in assets under management, has been making grants since 1967 and is dedicated to educational and environmental issues. In 2008, the foundation made 667 grants totaling $784.5m, nearly twice the amount of funds it distributed in the prior year. Since 2001, the Hewlett Foundation has distributed more than $100m to promote and support open educational resources. That probably rivals open source investments by IT vendor Hewlett-Packard (yes, HP, I am just baiting you here so you will indignantly email me and tell me the actual amount of money you spend promoting and supporting open source projects).

In a statement, Wikimedia said that Hewlett Foundation's money "comes at a critical time" in that the non-profit was just planning how "to maximize our impact around the world".

Wikipedia has more than 12 million articles, and the site is maintained by more than 100,000 volunteers, who create articles and translate them into over 265 languages. Wikipedia gets over 300 million unique visitors per month, according to rankings by comScore Media Metrix, making it the fifth most popular place on the internet.

As El Reg reported in January, Wikipedia estimated that it needed just under $6m to fund its operations through June 30, the end of its fiscal 2008/2009 year. Nearly half of that ($2.7m) was allocated for technology expenses. After a fundraising drive that ran from November 2008 through January 2009, the non-profit had raised $6.2m.

And the most amazing thing about Wikipedia is that Google has not yet bought it and tried to bend it to its ad-serving will. The company does have its own encyclopedia effort, called Knol, which was launched in December 2007 and which is still in beta.

In January, the last time Google gave out numbers, Knol had 100,000 articles. It would be easy to laugh this off as a nice start but a ridiculous showing, but remember, Google doesn't have to beg for money and rely on volunteers. All it has to do is create a little something called KnolSense and pay people a slice of the ad serving action on a revamped Knol site. You would be amazed at how quickly contributors will start lining up to create content on a Google site.

Or, maybe you wouldn't, now that I think of it. This is human nature. ®

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
Judge nixes HP deal for director amnesty after $8.8bn Autonomy snafu
Lawyers will have to earn their keep the hard way, says court
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.