Feeds

Samsung's second Android spied online

InstinctQ pictured

Business security measures using SSL

Images of Samsung’s second Android-based smartphone have cropped up online.

InstinctQ_01

Samsung's second Android phone: InstinctQ

While the Galaxy i7500 sports a smart and streamlined body, the firm’s second Android device – InstinctQ – is a slider with physical Qwerty thumbpad – which may explain the use of the letter ‘Q’ in the phone’s moniker.

The mole that leaked the images to website Phandroid hasn’t managed to sneak out any of the phone’s technical specifications and, sadly, the images - pretty as they are - don’t reveal much.

InstinctQ_02

A recently leaked document revealed the phone supports Wi-Fi

But, judging by the greasy fingerprints on the phone’s screen, we’d guess that the phone has a touchscreen display.

It’s worth remembering that a Wi-Fi certification document for the phone was discovered last month, though, confirming that the InstinctQ does at least support 802.11 b/g.

InstinctQ_04

A launch date hasn't been confirmed

Since Samsung hasn’t confirmed the InstinctQ’s existence, it isn’t yet known when the Android smartphone will launch.

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.