Feeds

MS revives Outlook for Mac

Entourage for the chop

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

Microsoft is to bring back a Mac version of Outlook, a move that will see the end of its current Mac OS X email, PIM and collaboration offering, Entourage.

This app will be canned when the next major release of Mac Office ships in late 2010.

Entourage was released in 2000, part of Office 2001. Entourage nominally replaced email package Outlook Express, but delivered a more Outlook-like array of functionality. That was back in the Mac OS 8.5 era, and Entourage has since evolved to support OS X. The most recent version was released in January 2008.

For a while, MS offered a crude version of Outlook for the Mac, though it removed the email features - present in Outlook Express - when Office 98 was released.

Outlook, despite being compatible only with Mac OS 9, was available to download - as Outlook 2001 - long after the release of OS X and Mac users' shift away from Classic apps.

Entourage could, of course, have been Outlook, but at the time MS was facing criticism from Office users who increasingly saw the Mac version of the suite as a rough knock-off of the Windows version, especially given the un-Mac like nature of the product's UI. Entourage was intended to show that MS was serious about the needs of its Mac customers, who generated a tidy income for the software giant.

MS said the new Outlook has been built from scratch using Mac OS X's Cocoa API with full integration with Apple's Spotlight data search technology and Time Machine back-ups. It'll incorporate a new, fast database and support information access rights management.

MS said it was announcing Outlook's arrival so soon - more than 18 months from its release - "to meet the planning needs of enterprise customers". Clearly, big businesses want Outlook support on Macs in a way they never appear to have done before. Entourage's ousting implies they want full parity with the Windows version. All of which suggests Apple is doing better at selling Mac into business than it has traditionally been perceived as doing. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
Raspberry Pi B+: PHWOAR, get a load of those pins
More USB ports than your laptop? You'd better believe it...
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
Now that's FIRE WIRE: HP recalls 6 MILLION burn-risk laptop cables
Right in the middle of Burning Mains Man week
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Apple's iWatch? They cannae do it ... they don't have the POWER
Analyst predicts fanbois will have to wait until next year
Super Cali signs a kill-switch, campaigners say it's atrocious
Remote-death button bad news for crooks, protesters – and great news for hackers?
HUGE iPAD? Maybe. HUGE ADVERTS? That's for SURE
Noo! Hand not big enough! Don't look at meee!
AMD unveils 'single purpose' graphics card for PC gamers and NO ONE else
Chip maker claims the Radeon R9 285 is 'best in its class'
prev story

Whitepapers

A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Maximize storage efficiency across the enterprise
The HP StoreOnce backup solution offers highly flexible, centrally managed, and highly efficient data protection for any enterprise.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.