Feeds

DoH rate-my-doc site won't name and shame individual docs

Or at least it will try not to

High performance access to file storage

The Department of Health is launching a doctor rating service in October, but it will not name and shame individual doctors.

The idea was announced back in December by then-Minister for Health Ben Bradshaw. He said at the time he wanted a site which would do for doctors what Amazon has done for the book trade.

The news emerged as the Department of Health launched a hospital comparison site on nhs.uk which includes various ratings for hospitals alongside comments from users and visitors. You can compare hospitals according to mortality rates, overall performance, infection rates, even car parking facilities or the quality of food.

A spokeswoman for the DoH said there would be a similar service for General Practices, not General Practitioners, launching in October. She said: "There will be comparisons and comments, but for practises, not individual doctors."

A spokesman for the British Medical Association remains unconvinced. He told us: "We still have concerns that it will be easy to identify individuals. It is difficult to imagine how it could work if it didn't give you enough information to identify individuals."

Of course there have been several attempts to launch privately funded sites which do identify and rate individual doctors before, but they've struggled to get enough feedback from patients to be really useful. And such sites are the norm in the US.

We've asked what this means for individually staffed practices and for other individuals like receptionists and practice nurses who might be identified but have yet to hear back. For some reason the Reg is as popular as swine flu down there... ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Android engineer: We DIDN'T copy Apple OR follow Samsung's orders
Veep testifies for Samsung during Apple patent trial
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
EFF: Feds plan to put 52 MILLION FACES into recognition database
System would identify faces as part of biometrics collection
Big Content goes after Kim Dotcom
Six studios sling sueballs at dead download destination
Alphadex fires back at British Gas with overcharging allegation
Brit colo outfit says it paid for 347KVA, has been charged for 1940KVA
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Jack the RIPA: Blighty cops ignore law, retain innocents' comms data
Prime minister: Nothing to see here, go about your business
Singapore decides 'three strikes' laws are too intrusive
When even a prurient island nation thinks an idea is dodgy it has problems
Banks slap Olympus with £160 MEEELLION lawsuit
Scandal hit camera maker just can't shake off its past
France bans managers from contacting workers outside business hours
«Email? Mais non ... il est plus tard que six heures du soir!»
prev story

Whitepapers

Mainstay ROI - Does application security pay?
In this whitepaper learn how you and your enterprise might benefit from better software security.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.