Feeds

Cisco patches DoS vuln pair in IOS

No exploit spotted

The essential guide to IT transformation

Cisco has issued a pair of updates today patching two remote denial of service vulnerabilities affecting certain devices running its Internetwork Operating System (IOS).

The vulnerabilities are limited to kit running Cisco IOS software with support for four-octet Autonomous Systems number space (AKA: 4-byte AS number) and Border Gateway Protocal (BGP) routing configured. Attackers could use the exploits for repeated reloading of the device causing an extended denial of service blockage.

The security holes were confirmed in Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XE with support for RFC4893.

The first vulnerability may cause an affected device to crash with memory corruption, but requires three conditions:

  • Cisco IOS Software device is a 4-byte AS number BGP speaker
  • BGP peering neighbor is a 2-byte AS number BGP speaker
  • BGP peering neighbor is capable of sending a BGP update with a series of greater than one thousand AS numbers

If an affected 4-byte AS number BGP speaker receives a BGP update from a 2-byte AS number BGP speaker containing AS path segments of more than one thousand autonomous systems, the device may crash with memory corruption and spit out the error "%%Software-forced reload."

Cisco says there is no workarounds on the affected device, but neighbors could be configured to discard routes that have more than one thousand AS numbers in the AS-path segment.

The second vulnerability could cause a device to reload when it processes a malformed BGP update that has been designed to trigger the issue.

This security hole requires three conditions as well:

  • Cisco IOS Software device is a 4-byte AS number BGP speaker
  • BGP peering neighbor is a 2-byte AS number BGP speaker
  • BGP peering neighbor is capable of sending a non-RFC complaint malicious BGP update message.

Cisco says configuring "bgp maxas-limited [value]" on the affected device will mitigate the vulnerability. The company suggests using a lowball value of 100 to best avoid the problem.

Updates have been issued to stop the vulnerabilities, and of course users are advised to update to the fixed version. Cisco said its not aware of anyone maliciously exploiting the security flaws, although some customers have accidentally triggered the first vulnerability within their infrastructures.

Additional details are available on the security notice here. ®

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

More from The Register

next story
e-Borders fiasco: Brits stung for £224m after US IT giant sues UK govt
Defeat to Raytheon branded 'catastrophic result'
Snowden on NSA's MonsterMind TERROR: It may trigger cyberwar
Plus: Syria's internet going down? That was a US cock-up
Who needs hackers? 'Password1' opens a third of all biz doors
GPU-powered pen test yields more bad news about defences and passwords
Think crypto hides you from spooks on Facebook? THINK AGAIN
Traffic fingerprints reveal all, say boffins
Microsoft cries UNINSTALL in the wake of Blue Screens of Death™
Cache crash causes contained choloric calamity
Germany 'accidentally' snooped on John Kerry and Hillary Clinton
Dragnet surveillance picks up EVERYTHING, USA, m'kay?
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.