Dutch spam suspect fined €250K
Clogged interwebs with 21m junk mails
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
Dutch telecoms regulators have fined a junk email spammer €250,000.
Reinier Schenkhuizen was ordered to pay €250,000 by local regulator OPTA. Of this, €150,000 was for distributing junk emails and €100,000 for failing to create a means for recipients to unsubscribe to unwanted messages, according to local reports. OPTA alleges that Schenkhuizen was a "persistent spammer", who distributed 21m junk mail messages via online mass-mailing portal ADVERTERENisGRATIS, which is owned by Schenkhuizen's firm Serinco Benelux.
The fine against Schenkhuizen will be increased by €5K per day, up to a maximum of €100K, for every day he continues to distribute spam. OPTA first warned Schenkhuizen over alleged spamming in March 2005. The receipt of 379 complaints since then, via official complaint site spamklacht.nl, prompted enforcement actions. OPTA's statement on the case (in Dutch) can be found here (English translation here).
Schenkhuizen denies the accusations. He told German Press Agency dpa that he was a software developer, whose only crime was maintaining a mailing portal.
Previous anti-spam enforcement action by OPTA including imposing fines of €510K against two corporations for consistently breaching Dutch anti-spam law back in May 2008. A Dutch botnet herder was separately hit with fines of €75K for sending 9bn spams, many promoting penis pills, in February 2007.
Anti-spam laws across Europe all exist under the same EU directive, but vary widely in how tough and effective they are. In Italy, convicted spammers are liable to face heavy fines and between six months to three years in prison. In the UK, by contrast, the worst that can happen is probably a case in the small claims court, as explained in a blog post by Rik Ferguson, a security consultant at Trend Micro, here. ®
COMMENTS
@unsubscribe
...also isn't the general advice NOT to click on links in unsolicited email?! that way lies untold security vulns/madness etc. Maybe OPTA should get fined for being dangerously incompetent. Although it could help create the next botnet and so give them someone else to fine, so maybe it does make sense...
Pint because i'm NOT on holiday ...
Unsubscribe
Surely anyone who clicks an "Unsubscribe" link in a spam is merely confirming that the original spam got through to a valid email address, thus releasing several gazillion more spams?
Pint, because I'm on holiday for the next 3 weeks...
If my guess at Dutch is any good
"ADVERTERENisGRATIS"
means something like "adverts are free", which with that fine, they aren't.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
