The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds
  • print
  • alert

Sample Shots

Sony DSC-HX1

Wide angle: pig ornament in the distance

Sony DSC-HX1

Super zoom with image stabilisation off

Sony DSC-HX1

Super zoom with image stabilisation on
Click for a full-resolution crop

Sony DSC-HX1

Dynamic range optimiser off

Sony DSC-HX1

Dynamic range optimiser: standard mode

Sony DSC-HX1

Dynamic range optimiser: plus mode
The DRO settings proved subtle to say the least

Sony DSC-HX1

Wide-angle

Sony DSC-HX1

Tele-photo
Click for a full-resolution crop

Anonymous Coward

@Stacy

You bought a bridge camera for the wrong reason. These and the better compact cameras are for people who do have real cameras but also like to have a second camera to carry with them 24/7.

And before spouting forth about the quality of something you bought a few years back take a look at this site. You can make direct comparisons of a wide range of cameras.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM

Yes there are differences but nothing that would justify carrying a full backpack of gear on the off chance of finding a not to be missed shot, nor in most cases such a great difference that it would jump out at you if you weren't looking for it.

1
0

Stacy

Have you ever used the HX1? Well I have and the image quality is brilliant for its price range.

Sweep panorama is brilliantly simple to use and produce ready to use panaromic images without the need of clunky stitching programs. Twilight is even more brilliant as it produces blur-less, flash-free and almost noise-free images in low-light situation comparable to my £700 DSLR.

Read the review by Steve Huff and you will see what the fuss is all about.

1
0
Anonymous Coward

Colin Wilson

Get over it.

1
0

@ Anonymous Coward

Nope I have not used the HX1. I was going from the sample shots in the review - which on my 20D would require 3200 ISO to compare to.

0
0

@Aristotles slow and dimwitted horse

I honestly do not believe that you have used a DSLR if think that there is no difference in image quality.

I brought a bridge camera to save money on lenses, and for ease of carrying a few years back. The image quality was on par with the shots in this review, and even a bridge camera is cluncky to carry around.

Within a year I was that fed up of the artifacts in the images, even on 100 ISO, that I swapped for a second hand mid range DSLR. Yes I have spent far more money on professional quality lenses etc - but even friends that have the standard lenses (and have spent not that much more than these cost, and have a nice upgrade path for the future) produce shots with quality way in excess of the sample shots here.

If you want snap shots of your holidays then fine (but if that's the case why not get a cheaper compact that produces similar image quality), if you want something to produce nice phtographs with get a real camera - you won't regret it in the long term.

0
0

More from The Register

Android is a mess and needs sprucing up, admits chief
Can Google really fix it? It isn't in control any more
New Lumia 925: This, loyalists, is the BIG ONE you've waited for
Nokia veep drills high-end master plan for El Reg
Android device? Ooohhhh, you mean a Samsung phone
Koreans nabbed nearly all the Q1 profits – more even than Google
Review: HP Pavilion 14 Chromebook
All roads lead to Chrome?
Borked your iDevice? Pay EVEN MORE to have it fixed by Applecare
Or scream at their hapless techies on their forums
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner
Report: AT&T dropping Facebook phone after dismal sales
Turns out folks won't buy that for a dollar