Feeds

SEC extends Jobsian health probe

What did the board know?

Intelligent flash storage arrays

Steve Jobs may be back at work as Apple's CEO - part-time, at least - but his troubles aren't over.

And this time, they're not health-related.

A Wednesday report from Bloomberg cites the eternally loquacious "person familiar with the matter" as saying that the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is proceeding with its investigation, rumored to have begun in January, into whether Apple misled investors as to the state of Jobs's health during his recent medical leave.

Key to the probe is how Job's health could have gone from a simple "hormonal imbalance" on January 5th of this year to a condition serious enough for him to issue a statement on January 14th announcing that he would take an extended medical leave - an absence that included a liver transplant in April.

Simply put, what did Apple's board of directors know, when did they know it, and were they misleading investors by either withholding information or simply lying about Jobs's true condition?

Jobs's medical saga began back in 2004. In early August of that year, he sent an email to Apple employees informing them that he was taking the month off to recuperate from an operation that removed an islet cell neuroendocrine tumor - a rare form of pancreatic cancer.

This January, Jobs released an open letter to the "Apple Community" that his obvious weight loss during 2008, which had been "a mystery to me and my doctors," had been determined to be caused by that now-legendary hormonal imbalance. In the same letter, Jobs stated that "The remedy for this nutritional problem is relatively simple and straightforward."

A mere nine days later, however, Jobs announced that he would take a six-month medical leave because his health problems were "more complex" than he had originally thought. That complexity lead to the aforementioned liver transplant.

Apple is notoriously secretive, and Steve Jobs is notoriously private. But investors have the right to know details about a company in which they have a vested interest, including information about that company's leadership.

However, members of that corporate leadership also have a right to privacy - and that's where the legal issues get murky regarding how much information Apple's board of directors either could or should have released concerning Jobs's true condition.

It's unknown either what the board knew or what intelligence the SEC probe has brought to light - Bloomberg was unable to squeeze any information out of Apple, the SEC, or relevant members of Apple's board.

What is indisputable, however, is that Jobs's absence did not materially impair Apple's performance. In late April, the company released a financial statement that reported its first Jobsless quarter's profits were up 15 per cent from the same period during the previous year. And that was in the midst of the same Meltdown that was hammering other tech and consumer-electronics firms.

That solid performance is more than proof of Apple's health. It's also relevant to any legal action that the SEC or investors might be considering.

Peter Henning, a former federal prosecutor and SEC lawyer, told Bloomberg that despite Jobs's iconic status as Apple's visionary leader, the company's recent performance may prove that his health isn't material to investor's concerns.

"They did fine," Henning said. "Do you need to say more than, 'Our CEO has health problems and he's out on leave?' The question I think the SEC is looking at is whether it's material."

From where we sit, Apple's investors have little to worry about. The company's stock price is hovering around $135 per share today. Compare that with $75 in mid-January when Jobs announced his medical leave.

More will be known about how material Jobs's absence has been when Apple releases its next earnings report on July 21st. With the success of the iPhone 3GS, the reported popularity of its revitalized MacBook line, and rumors of an impending iPod refresh, we expect the investment community will have little to complain about.

Except, of course, about being kept in the dark about Jobs's true condition over the past year.

But solid profits have a way of soothing hurt feelings. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.