Feeds

NetApp ponders getting off the pot, or...

Warmenhoven's carefully constructed holding position

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Comment What do you make of this? "In response to EMC’s revised, unsolicited offer, the NetApp Board of Directors will carefully weigh its options, keeping in mind both its fiduciary duty to its stockholders and its disciplined acquisition strategy. We will provide an update shortly."

The statement maker is NetApp's chairman and CEO, Dan Warmenhoven, responding to yesterday's uprated EMC all-cash bid for Data Domain at $33.50/share, trumping NetApp's $30/share part-stock, part-cash bid. Data Domain's board has already agreed the NetApp bid, with Data Domain CEO Frank Slootman having received a warm welcome at a NetApp all-hands meeting at Sunnyvale last month. Now he might have to fly to Hopkinton, Massachusetts, and say how pleased he and his company are to be welcomed into the EMC fold - cue much gnashing of teeth.

EMC's offer is free of deal protection, clear of any FTC encumbrance, not dependent on any due diligence, and the cash is available now; you can smell the money.

NetApp's bid has deal protection and needs a month longer than the EMC bid to clear. The NetApp people know EMC has greater cash resources - $2.7bn is being suggested - than NetApp, where $1.2bn is the figure being used, with half of that invested outside the USA and liable for tax if brought into the USA for use in the bid.

In this game of bid-tennis NetApp has anticipated a possible EMC bid raise in its analysis and, equally obviously, has anticipated what it could do. So EMC has served up a $33.50 ball. One response is to return it with a dropshot by matching the bid with its own $33.50 part-stock, part-cash offer, get Data Domain to accept it, as before, and see what EMC does.

Another possible return is to hit is straight back with force, raising the stakes to $34.00 or even $35.00/share, saying to Joe Tucci: "Put up or shut up." The trouble is Tucci has more cash and can keep the rally going for longer until NetApp runs out of steam.

What will EMC do if NetApp matches its bid? It will probably raise its own bid a little and enjoy its own "put up or shut up" game and wait for NetApp to feel the heat and get out of the kitchen. There's no upside for NetApp in a cash competition. If EMC is willing to pay more for Data Domain and DD shareholders prefer Hopkinton dollars to Sunnyvale shares, then game over and Dan Warmenhoven walks.

The talk of fiduciary duty and disciplined acquisition strategy is not evocative of an aggressive, gung-ho approach. It could be taken as preparation for a tactical withdrawal so that NetApp could turn its attention to the next target in its acquisition strategy.

Who might that be? Storage commentator Robin Harris suggests Quantum. There's mischievous cheek here as EMC has loaned debt-burdened Quantum $100m to help it continue its DXi deduplication development work, and both EMC and Dell license Quantum's deduplication technology.

Oh, the joy of it, to have EMC licensing NetApp-owned de-duped technology. How Dan Warmenhoven might relish calling up Rick Belluzzo, Quantum's CEO, and invite him to dance the Sunnyvale samba? Joe Tucci would be in a twist, with people at NetApp gleefully thinking revenge is a dish best served hot, spicy and quick.

Such considerations would be dismissed at NetApp executive levels of course. We're talking fiduciary duty and disciplined acquisition strategy here, not a corporate ego contest. Also Quantum wouldn't bring a great increase to NetApp's cashflow, it not having a successful market-leading product like Data Domain, on the one hand, and being held back by its debt repayments on the other.

If NetApp did try to buy Quantum, with EMC, bulked up by Data Domain, prevented from bidding by anti-trust concerns, then it would watch as EMC became awash with Data Domain dollars and carried on marching towards the information infrastructure horizon, leaving pure storage play NetApp even further behind in the revenue stakes. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Bitcasa bins $10-a-month Infinite storage offer
Firm cites 'low demand' plus 'abusers'
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Pssst. Want to buy a timeshare in the clouds?
The Google dilemma — controller or spreader of knowledge?
CAGE MATCH: Microsoft, Dell open co-located bit barns in Oz
Whole new species of XaaS spawning in the antipodes
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
New hybrid storage solutions
Tackling data challenges through emerging hybrid storage solutions that enable optimum database performance whilst managing costs and increasingly large data stores.