Feeds

EMC preps FCoE I/O module

Hot-swap UltraFlex

Boost IT visibility and business value

EMC has confirmed industry suspicious that is developing a hot-swap Ultraflex FCoE module for its storage arrays.

Yesterday Chad Sakac, EMC's VMware Technology Alliance veep, revealed: "We’re now, of course, developing an ultraflex IO module for FCoE, which (is) hot-swappable."

FCoE (Fibre Channel Over Ethernet) sends Fibre Channel messages across an Ethernet cable and will enable faster overall transmissions because things happen lower down the network protocol stack than with iSCSI and NFS, which rely on TCP/IP, according to Sakac.

"Because of the intrinsic model of the protocol stack, the higher you go, the longer the latencies in various operations." He cites transmission loss handling as an example.

With FCoE, such loss handling is carried out at the Ethernet layer, via the coming 802.1Qbb standard, in milliseconds, whereas it can take tens of seconds for NFS.

UltraFlex is the name for the I/O technology used in EMC's Clariion CX4 arrays and newer Celerras. It provides a means to add new I/O protocols to the array by plugging in cards. The CX4 came with 4Gbit/s Fibre Channel and iSCSI modules. It meant that EMC could later add 8Gbit/s Fibre Channel, 10GigE, FCoE and even InfiniBand if it wished.

Until now NetApp has been the sole big storage array supplier to demonstrate an FCoE interface to its storage. Sakac has confirmed what many people have suspected, that EMC is indeed developing an FCoE module which will enable end-to-end FCoE links between servers, any intervening FCoE-handling Ethernet switch and the Clariion array.

Sakac thinks server edge networking will converge onto Ethernet, partly because Intel will support 802.1Qbb and provide a software initiator.

Because of this, FCoE support will "just be an attribute of every commodity NIC and switch on the market. Everyone in the FC HBA/switch market is rushing to it not because they want proprietary, but rather because we're reaching the inflection point where if you’re not doing this, you’re going to be out of business (maybe not today, but at a relatively near “tomorrow”)."

Currently, end-to-end FCoE is limited to 2-hop networks for now, server-to-switch-to-array. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
Object storage bods Exablox: RAID is dead, baby. RAID is dead
Bring your own disks to its object appliances
Nimble's latest mutants GORGE themselves on unlucky forerunners
Crossing Sandy Bridges without stopping for breath
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.