Feeds

The great FM radio switch-off: Don't Panic!

The media's media dept got Carter completely wrong

The essential guide to IT transformation

Digital Britain Media sections of newspapers are usually the weakest, and you can guess the reasons why. It's an institutional thing. Because of a gentleperson's agreement that they'll never dish the dirt on each other, the real stories are buried - you'll be lucky if the occasional one washes up in Private Eye.

Nor is it a hindrance if a reporter understands neither business or technology; you can still be a media expert, and one day, most correspondents dream of one day being a media executive. Or at least a consultant. So, naturally, the Emperor is always wearing the finest threads.

But rarely have the massed ranks of Media Correspondents ever got it so badly wrong as they did with the radio this week.

Radio analyst Grant Goddard points out that contrary to media reports, there's no mention of an analogue switch-off in the Carter report, and no edict to close down analogue transmission. It's merely an inference, based on some wishful thinking. Carter has kicked the radio crisis back onto the industry. As one broadcaster told us:

"The attitude is a plague on all your houses, it's sort your shit out. It's not really our problem. Radio is left with a lot of problems unresolved, but the key thing is there's no money to pay for any of the goals."

So why were we reading about the largest mass obsolescence of technology ever seen in Britain this week? Let's have another look at what Lord Carter's report really said.

In paragraph 9 of Chapter 3b ("Radio Going Digital") the report states:

At the heart of our vision is the delivery of a Digital Radio Upgrade programme by the end of 2015.

OK, that's a target date for the achievement of an aspiration. But what's he aspiring to, exactly?

On that date all services carried on the national and local DAB multiplexes will cease broadcasting on analogue. At the same time, a new tier of ultra local radio... will occupy the vacated FM spectrum. Radio services will either upgrade to DAB or if they are within the ultra-local tier, to FM. This will deliver an upgrade from FM to DAB and from MW to FM.

That's clear enough. Carter wants major broadcasters off analogue. He wants a date - his own preferred is 31/12/2015 - and he wants this date (whatever it may be - note the uncertainty already creeping into the details) to be announced two years ahead of time. But he points out that this should only be approved if he criteria set out by the DRWG (Digital Radio Working Group) has been met. Which is:

  • 50 per cent of listening is digital [not the same as DAB, note]
  • DAB is comparable to FM coverage, and local DAB reaches 90 per cent of all population, and all major roads.

This may or may not happen in time for that aspirational end-of-2015 date, we'll return to that in a moment.

Then there's a scary threat to terminate licences - inviting us to infer that any analogue hold outs will be hunted down, rounded up and shot. In Paragraph 43 Carter states:

"... we will introduce new legislation which will insert a two-year termination clause into all new licences."

And Paragraph 44 appears to reiterate the same point:

"If by the end of 2013 it is clear the Digital Upgrade timetable will not be achieved, we will use the powers, set out above, to terminate licences and the existing licensing regimes will apply"

But to understand this, you need an insight into the complex and expensive way Ofcom grants radio licences.

There are four tiers of license, all fixed-term, and varying slightly in the fundamentals. But what most share in common is an incentive - a bribe or sweetener, if you prefer - for analogue broadcasters to adopt DAB. When licences come up for renewal, either a sealed bid auction or a beauty pageant determines the winner. (They can also be traded, but let's leave that to one side). Ofcom promised automatic renewal of the analogue licence if the broadcaster took up a DAB license.

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Ballmer leaves Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Broadband slow and expensive? Blame Telstra says CloudFlare
Won't peer, will gouge for Internet transit
prev story

Whitepapers

A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Maximize storage efficiency across the enterprise
The HP StoreOnce backup solution offers highly flexible, centrally managed, and highly efficient data protection for any enterprise.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.