Feeds

Data Domain sued over NetApp takeover

Shareholders cry for EMC

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Data Domain chose NetApp's takeover bid over EMC, and now dissident shareholders are crying dirty dealing.

Two law firms have launched separate class-action lawsuits against Data Domain's board of directors, saying the bidding process wasn't fair and open.

On Monday, Data Domain rejected a hostile takeover offer from storage giant, EMC, which asked shareholders to back a $30-per-share acquisition. Data Domain's board instead opted for a similar $30-per-share offer from NetApp, to be paid in both cash and stock.

The law firm Levi & Korsinsky has now filed a class-action lawsuit in California, accusing Data Domain's board of unfairly choosing NetApp because it offered cushy executive jobs.

"NetApp offered positions on its board to certain Data Domain officers and there are rumors that Data Domain CEO [Frank] Slootman could be the next CEO of NetApp," the law firm said in a statement. "This raises questions as to whether the sales process conducted by the Board was fair and open."

Meanwhile, attorneys at Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann on behalf of stock holders from the Police and Fire Retirement System of the city of Detroit accuse Data Domain of giving NetApp an "improper bidding advantage."

The lawsuit filed in Delaware claims NetApp slapped on a "no shop/no talk" provision, matching rights, and a $57m termination fee that prevented that company from talking to EMC or others interested in acquiring the company.

"They agreed to the NetAp merger without following even the most basic process for informing themselves of the best available transaction," the lawsuit claims. It seeks an injunction preventing Data Domain and NetApp from closing the deal.

Shareholder lawsuits are fairly common in major acquisitions, but this one does have a bit of a twist. Data Domain management might not like the idea of selling to EMC, but it's hard to refute (from a shareholder position) that a cash deal is better than a cash-and-stock bid of the same value. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ellison: Sparc M7 is Oracle's most important silicon EVER
'Acceleration engines' key to performance, security, Larry says
Linux? Bah! Red Hat has its eye on the CLOUD – and it wants to own it
CEO says it will be 'undisputed leader' in enterprise cloud tech
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
Hey, what's a STORAGE company doing working on Internet-of-Cars?
Boo - it's not a terabyte car, it's just predictive maintenance and that
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.