The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds
  • print
  • alert

POV-Ray Rendering

Core i7 Exteme - POV-Ray

Rendering time in Seconds (s)
Shorter bars are better

Cinebench 10 Rendering

Core i7 Exteme - Cinebench 10

Longer bars are better

Core i7 Exteme - Cinebench 10

SiSoft Sandra Results
Memory Bandwidth

Core i7 Exteme - SiSoft Sandra

Bandwidth in Gigabytes per Second (GB/s)
Longer bars are better

Core i7 Exteme - SiSoft Sandra

Memory Latency

Core i7 Exteme - SiSoft Sandra

Memory latency in Nanoseconds (ns)
Shorter bars are better

Latest Comments

@psistar

Because;

less power = less heat = less cooling required

This means less noise, greater stability and potentially increased headroom for further overclocking.

0
0

power draw? who cares?

I am sure that sounds very mean spirited and anti-earth, but who is reading these evaluations? Dell? HP? Nooooo, people who are going to build a few machines at best and likely only 1, this year. They want maximum smoke ... as in speed.

Ok, I know that is is all pc to talk about crunch per watt, so fine.

0
0

@PhilW

Damn, no bitey ;-)

To be fair, if you are running [good] water cooling then it will probably go usefullyt further than a 920 - but even if I had a hypothetical £2k to wang on a rig, I still think that, say, three or four high end GPUs SLI/Crossfired up would make more of a difference than the Extreme. especially once the OpenCL-esque code starts appearing in a couple of years for GPGPU tasking - such as on Snow Leper, er, Leopard, etc.

That said, if I had £3k to spend...well, you're then in the position to start being a badge snob, and I'm always a sucker for that if I can when it comes to tech kit....

[PS: Should I come into £3k, I'll get your psychologists number...]

:-)

Steven R

0
0

bar graphs

the scaling is completely wrong given how close the chips benchmark.

0
0

@Steven Raith

> Are you seriously suggesting that a couple of extra hundred stable megahertz - at best, from

> what I have seen - are worth the £500 extra for an Extreme processor?

Steven, nowhere did I suggest that it was actually WORTH the money. My only comment was that there IS a minor difference between the 920 and the 975 that wasn't mentioned. As to why I bought one ... well, I'll ask my psychologist about that.

(Actually I'm convinced that with the watercooling I'm employing and some combination multiplier and other overclocking tweaks then I can far exceed the possibilities of the 920 with the 975 but it's a bit of a gamble and it's distinctly possible I'll fail.)

0
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Microsoft reveals Xbox One, the console that can read your heartbeat
Upgrades Live service – and no always-on requirement
US boffin builds 32-way Raspberry Pi cluster
Beowulf cluster built for the price of a single PC
Review: HP Pavilion 14 Chromebook
All roads lead to Chrome?
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner
Fairphone goes on sale to all
The Android handset that's PC can be yours
Nintendo throws flaming legal barrel at YouTubing fans
All your walk-through vid revenue are belong to us
Startup hires 'cyborg' Mann for Google Glass–killer project
3D augmented reality specs coming your way this year

Hands on with Hyper-V 3.0 and virtual machine movement

Our award-winning Regcasts have teamed up with training provider QA for the deepest of deep dives into Hyper-V, including a live demo.

Understand VM movement - just click to play, or go here for a bigger version.