Feeds

Intel crowds ultrathin chip space

Cut-rate Celerons rumored

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

Intel is said to be preparing the release of new low-power chips for ultrathin notebooks, even as it watches its current chips dip in market share when compared to those from arch-rival AMD.

According to a report from Taiwanese market watchdog DigiTimes, those ever-gabby "sources at notebook makers" say that two new microprocessors - the Celeron 740 and SU2300 - will be targeted at entry-level ultrathins.

DigiTimes's sources say that both the Celeron 740 and SU2300 will be dual-core processors, clocked at 1.3GHz and 1.2GHz, respectively. Both will have a 1MB L2 cache and ride on an 800MHz frontside bus. What suits the power-miserly pair best for the ultrathin market, however, is their identically cool 10-watt TDP.

Those omniscient sources also claim that Intel's existing ultrathin-bound chips are due for a price drop in August, which would enable the average selling price of such a notebook based on the Celeron 723 to be in the NT$22,000 to NT$20,000 range. That'd be around £400 to £370 in UK cash and $675 to $615 US.

Such a move might help Intel win back some of the market share it recently lost to AMD. As we reported yesterday, new research by market-intelligence firm iSuppli shows Intel's market share slipping by 2.5 per cent in the first quarter of this year.

Needless to say, Intel's lead is still a hefty one. Its share remains over six times as large as AMD's. But, seeing as how iSuppli estimates that global microprocessor sales totalled $6.9bn (£4.2bn) in the first quarter of 2009, 2.5 per cent of those sales adds up to over $172m (£104.1m) - hardly chump change.

Both Intel and AMD are betting big on the ultrathin market - Intel trying to convince us that "Thin is in" and AMD busily prepping its ultrathin-bound Congo platform for release later this quarter.

If and when they are released, Intel's Celeron 740 and SU2300 will enter an increasingly crowded ultrathin battleground. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
End of buttons? Apple looks to patent animating iPhone sidewalls
Filing suggests handset with display strips
Samsung Gear S: Quick, LAUNCH IT – before Apple straps on iWatch
Full specs for wrist-mounted device here ... but who'll buy it?
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Now that's FIRE WIRE: HP recalls 6 MILLION burn-risk laptop cables
Right in the middle of Burning Mains Man week
Apple's iWatch? They cannae do it ... they don't have the POWER
Analyst predicts fanbois will have to wait until next year
Reg man looks through a Glass, darkly: Google's toy ploy or killer tech specs?
Tip: Put the shades on and you'll look less of a spanner
HUGE iPAD? Maybe. HUGE ADVERTS? That's for SURE
Noo! Hand not big enough! Don't look at meee!
AMD unveils 'single purpose' graphics card for PC gamers and NO ONE else
Chip maker claims the Radeon R9 285 is 'best in its class'
prev story

Whitepapers

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup
Learn why inSync received the highest overall rating from Druva and is the top choice for the mobile workforce.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.