Feeds

Anti-Eurofighter Downing Street e-petition started

Pay taxes and/or support our troops? You should sign

Boost IT visibility and business value

In one word, what's wrong with the British armed forces these days? That word is Eurofighter.

As to cost, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) in recent years estimated the entire planned British buy of 232 jets at £20bn, putting each plane at £86m. (Any lesser figure can be produced only by very creative accounting.) However, it is widely acknowledged that the RAF cannot in fact use more than 120-odd jets plus some attrition spares. Meanwhile, it is also well known that the RAF would like a much more capable strike capability than the "austere" option currently on offer. The cost to the UK taxpayer of enhancing Tranche 3 aircraft in this way has been reported as an additional £5bn.

In the worst possible case, with the UK taking 232 jets, mothballing 90+ permanently, and paying to enhance Tranche 3, the price paid per aircraft used in RAF service could beat £180m. Depending on exchange rates, this would make UK Eurofighters even more expensive than the American F-22 Raptor stealth ultrafighter - and considerably less capable.

However, the UK has already arranged to sell some of its Eurofighters on to the Saudis, and is trying to shift more to other customers. Sadly it's clear that these sales will involve more capable aircraft from the later manufacture tranches, as nobody else wants single-role air to air fighters any more either. It may be hard to get any sales at all: former BAE chief Mike Turner has lately appealed to the MoD to "finish the job" on multi-roling Eurofighter so as to make it saleable.

Bottom line, then: the Eurofighters which fly with the RAF will have cost us somewhere between £100m and £150m each depending how many of the mothball fleet we can sell off. All or most of them will be pure air-superiority fighters, completely lacking in the Stealth technology now beginning to be seen as vital in that field, with "austere" strike capability bolted on. We will have spent more to get this rather irrelevant capability than it will cost to replace the national nuclear deterrent. The Eurofighter quite simply dwarfs all other major equipment projects at present - the new carriers for the navy are a matter of peanuts by comparison.

More than any other single thing, the Eurofighter is the cause of the terrible financial paralysis now gripping our armed forces. More than any other single thing, the Eurofighter is the reason why our fighting men and women overseas don't have the helicopters and transport planes they need, and why they get paid so abysmally badly.

The Eurofighter is also the reason that the Royal Navy may never be allowed to re-acquire proper fleet carrier capability. This despite the fact that the lack of that capability caused almost all the losses and casualties we suffered in the Falklands, and the very salient fact that every time a British fighter has shot down an enemy aircraft since WWII, that fighter took off from a carrier to do so.

But we don't have to have Tranche 3. The Treasury, at least, believe that we could simply pull out of it and save money, regardless of possible penalties under our agreement with the partner nations. Only Prime Minister Brown's personal intervention is keeping UK Tranche 3 alive at present.

That's why your correspondent has signed the petition - though the No.10 website doesn't say so yet for some reason. Any readers who pay British taxes or support the British fighting forces might consider signing up as well. ®

Bootnote

We didn't start the petition. Reg reader Patrick Seurre did.

Boost IT visibility and business value

More from The Register

next story
'Stop dissing Google or quit': OK, I quit, says Code Club co-founder
And now a message from our sponsors: 'STFU or else'
Ex US cybersecurity czar guilty in child sex abuse website case
Health and Human Services IT security chief headed online to share vile images
Don't even THINK about copyright violation, says Indian state
Pre-emptive arrest for pirates in Karnataka
The police are WRONG: Watching YouTube videos is NOT illegal
And our man Corfield is pretty bloody cross about it
Felony charges? Harsh! Alleged Anon hackers plead guilty to misdemeanours
US judge questions harsh sentence sought by prosecutors
Oz biz regulator discovers shared servers in EPIC FACEPALM
'Not aware' that one IP can hold more than one Website
Apple tried to get a ban on Galaxy, judge said: NO, NO, NO
Judge Koh refuses Samsung ban for the third time
prev story

Whitepapers

Best practices for enterprise data
Discussing how technology providers have innovated in order to solve new challenges, creating a new framework for enterprise data.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?