Photographs of a peace campaigner taken during a surveillance operation by the Metropolitan Police should be destroyed, because the images were a disproportionate infringement of his human rights.

The court of appeal ruled yesterday in favour of Andrew Wood, who had committed no offence, the Beeb reports. Wood lost his original casein June last year. He was a media spokesman for the Campaign Against the Arms Trade.

Lord Justice Dyson said: "The retention by the police of photographs taken of persons who have not committed an offence, and who are not even suspected of having committed an offence, is always a serious matter."

Wood attended Reed Elsevier's annual general meeting to object to it running the Spearhead arms fair. He bought a share in the firm in order to attend the meeting. Police photographed him leaving the meeting in 2005, questioned him and followed him to the tube station. Wood was not arrested.

The police routinely use Forward Intelligence Teams (FIT) to take video and still images of protestors. This can continue, but officers will have to change the way they keep such images. ®

Related stories

• Met hires Twitter consultancy (25 August 2009)
• Boffins showcase do-it-yourself flying spy drone (12 August 2009)
• Deutsche Bank sacks two for spying (21 July 2009)
• Updated Kent Police clamp down on tall photographers (15 July 2009)
• Kodak retiring iconic Kodachrome film (22 June 2009)
• Britain leads world in police state survey (1 June 2009)
• Comment If they can break the law, why can't we? (24 May 2009)
• Charges against London tube tourist snapper thrown out (19 May 2009)
• Comment Police, Cameras, Inaction! (17 April 2009)
• Comment Photography rights: Snappers to descend on Scotland Yard (12 February 2009)
• Comment Photography: Yes, you have rights (23 December 2008)
• New terror guidelines on photography (1 December 2008)
• Street View operatives object to being snapped (16 September 2008)
• Police protester snap did not breach rights (3 June 2008)