Feeds

Michael Dell faces questions in crime-camera case

New Orleans deposition

High performance access to file storage

Michael Dell, chairman and CEO of the eponymous computer vendor, has been deposed by a New Orleans judge in a lawsuit concerning double-dealing in that famously corrupt city's crime-camera program.

The lawsuit is heinously complex, but we can safely say that it accuses the computer vendor of acting improperly when providing a lucrative security-camera system to New Orleans.

In the deposition, Michael Dell will be asked about whether the sale of the security cameras came up in an alleged meeting between him and New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin in June 2004.

The meeting remains "alleged" because, according to the AP, a Dell attorney claims that neither Nagin nor Michael Dell remember it.

Another Dell employee, however, recently said in a sworn statement that he was at the meeting, which he said took place "on or about June 21, 2004" - although he said that only public-school equipment was discussed, not crime cameras.

At the crux of the lawsuit is the accusation by two companies, Active Solutions and Southern Electronics, that their surveillance system was ripped-off by Dell and its partner NetMethods and sold to the city's allegedly corrupt technology chief, Greg Meffert.

Complicating the matter is that the city's technology department bought cameras from Dell despite the fact that such equipment was not part of a purchasing agreement approved by the Louisiana state purchasing office.

According to the New Orleans Time-Picayune, the camera prohibition inspired Dell's Louisiana purchasing coordinator to ask a New Orleans city hall subcontractor in an email, "Can we use a different word than camera in the description, as we are not allowed to sell cameras on our contract? I'm thinking video capture module or something like that." Dell eventually settled on the term "eyeball."

At the center of the controversy is the city's technology chief, Greg Meffert, who not-coincidentally availed himself of an alleged $130,000 in personal purchases supplied by a city subcontractor involved in the brouhaha, including a trip for mayor Nagin's family to Jamaica and a San Francisco vacation for Meffert that included a bill for $2,700 at a strip club.

And now it's time for Michael Dell to weigh in on all these shenanigans - whether he wants to or not.

The trial is set for September. ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Oz bank in comedy Heartbleed blog FAIL
Bank: 'We are now safely patched.' Customers: 'You were using OpenSSL?'
Forget the beach 'n' boardwalk, check out the Santa Cruz STEVE JOBS FOUNTAIN
Reg reader snaps shot of touching tribute to Apple icon
Happy 40th Playmobil: Reg looks back at small, rude world of our favourite tiny toys
Little men straddle LOHAN, attend tiny G20 Summit... ah, sweet memories...
Lego is the TOOL OF SATAN, thunders Polish priest
New minifigs like Monster Fighters are turning kids to the dark side
Dark SITH LORD 'Darth Vader' joins battle to rule, er, Ukraine
Only I can 'make an empire out of a republic' intones presidential candidate
Chinese company counters pollution by importing fresh air
Citizens line up for bags of that sweet, sweet mountain air
Google asks April Fools: Want a job? Be our 'Pokemon Master'
Mountain View is prankin' like it's 1999...
prev story

Whitepapers

Mainstay ROI - Does application security pay?
In this whitepaper learn how you and your enterprise might benefit from better software security.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.