Feeds

Hacked flight sim site in catastrophic crash and burn

Avsim, RIP

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

A popular website for users of flight simulation gear has been felled, most likely fatally, after malicious hackers attacked both of the servers housing more than 12 years worth of content supplied by its 60,000 members.

Tom Allensworth, the founder of Avsim.com, said in a statement that that an attack on Tuesday left the site "effectively destroyed." He added: "The method of the hack makes recovery difficult, if not impossible, to recover from. We are not able to predict when we will be back online, if we can come back at all."

The news sent an outpouring of sympathy and rage on temporary forum boards set up in the aftermath. "I just read a post in the SimV forums about the veritable catastrophe that has struck Avsim, and along with it, the flightsimming community as a whole, and was shocked, furious and saddened all at the same time," one participant wrote.

But the debacle has also led to criticism that Avsim operators didn't take steps to better protect the site's rich store of content. According to Allensworth, data from the library and email server was backed up on a separate server for the website and forums and vice versa. Alas, it would appear there was never a master copy stored offsite and offline, so when both servers were attacked, more than a decade of links, software modifications, and exchanges were permanently destroyed.

"Who would have predicted the simultaneous successful attacks on our system?" Allensworth wrote in one message. "Over 12 years of very secure operation and no successful attacks kind of indicated to me that our approach was at least working. On Tuesday, the 12th of May at about 10:00 p.m. EDT, we found out otherwise."

The trouble started earlier that evening, when parts of the site stopped working, according to this account. First, FTP and SSH access to the site stopped working, and later, the web and forum server was knocked offline. Soon, the email and library server also showed signs of problems. It wasn't until the servers were rebooted that the admins discovered that "the partitions on both servers had been removed."

It remains unclear who is responsible or exactly how the attacks were carried out. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
FYI: OS X Yosemite's Spotlight tells Apple EVERYTHING you're looking for
It's on by default – didn't you read the small print?
Russian hackers exploit 'Sandworm' bug 'to spy on NATO, EU PCs'
Fix imminent from Microsoft for Vista, Server 2008, other stuff
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Microsoft pulls another dodgy patch
Redmond makes a hash of hashing add-on
NOT OK GOOGLE: Android images can conceal code
It's been fixed, but hordes won't have applied the upgrade
Apple grapple: Congress kills FBI's Cupertino crypto kybosh plan
Encryption would lead us all into a 'dark place', claim G-Men
'LulzSec leader Aush0k' found to be naughty boy not worthy of jail
15 months home detention leaves egg on feds' faces as they grab for more power
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.