Feeds

Seagate slashes more jobs

1,100 sacrifices for $125m annual savings

Security for virtualized datacentres

Seagate is cutting a further 1,100 jobs with a view to reaching break-even point, aiming to save $125m a year.

Seagate is the world's largest supplier of hard disk drives and the cuts represent 2.5 percent of its global headcount. They will get Seagate's cost down to less than $300m a quarter and, hopefully, make the firm profitable within its fiscal 2010 year.

The cost - largely in severance payments - will be about $72m, and the redundancies should be complete by the end of next month. Seagate has reduced its global labour costs by 25 percent since the beginning of 2009, with this latest set of cuts included.

It has closed two recording media facilities and its Pittsburgh research facility, as well as imposing company-wide salary reductions. Other facilities may close as the company is saying it "continues to assess options to further reduce manufacturing operating costs".

Seagate reported a loss for its third 2009 quarter, following a loss in its second quarter, and cancelled dividend payments.

All this first came to a head back in January when Seagate axed CEO BIll Watkins and chairman Stephen Luczo took over the CEO's job. Since then he has instituted a review of, and reduction of, Seagate's cost structure as it struggles with its reduced sales in the recession being insufficient to cover its manufacturing and other costs.

This was not helped by Seagate becoming less successful in the 2.5-inch, small form factor drive market, where competitor Western Digital made product sales headway with area density leadership. Seagate has since regained areal density parity in that market. Western Digital also appeared relatively more successful in the externally-attached hard drive market. Again Seagate has responded with a boosted FreeAgent line.

Luczo has also had to cope with Barracuda product quality problems.

The latest headcount reductions means that Seagate will be at its most efficient with an estimated 40 million hard drives being produced by its reduced number of employees, according to Stifel Nicolas analyst Aaron Rakers. There is no indication of where, in Seagate's operations, the headcount reductions will be made.

Coincidentally, competitor Western Digital is re-hiring people in its Thailand plants. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
Symantec backs out of Backup Exec: Plans to can appliance in Jan
Will still provide support to existing customers
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.