Feeds

Disk platter sizes vary with drive speeds

Faster speeds equal small platters

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Comment When is a 2.5-inch form factor drive not a 2.5-inch form factor drive?

A small form factor (SFF) drive comes in an industry standard 2.5-inch form factor case size. Inside that there can be one or two platters and which can be smaller or larger. Yes, they will be smaller platters than ones found in 3.5-inch form factor cases, but the largest of them can nearly equal a small platter found inside a high-speed 3.5-inch form factor disk drive.

The thing is that rotating a platter at high speeds is a hard thing to do because the higher the speed the stronger, and generally larger, the platter central mounting has to be, and the physically smaller the platter has to be so that the outer areas don't wobble and cause a data mis-read or worse, as in head crash worse.

What this speed:size relationship means is that a Seagate Momentus 7200.9 SFF laptop drive spins at 7900rpm and has a larger platter size than a Savvio SFF drive spinning at 15,000rpm.

This means that areal density comments about drives have to be made with reference both to the external case dimensions - 3.5 or 2.5-inch - and to the internal platter size. Generally such areal density statements don't refer to the platter size at all. A SFF Momentus 7900 might have 250MB/platter while the SFF Savvio 15K.2 has 148MB, but that doesn't mean the Savvio has lesser areal density. It has a smaller physical platter area and that's why its capacity is so much less.

In the enterprise storage area, a 3.5-inch Barracuda ES.2, spinning at 7,200rpm, can hold a maximum of 1TB on its two platters whilst a Cheetah 15K.8, spinning at 15,000rpm, can hold only 450GB on its two smaller platters. But then it is a much faster drive.

There are no generally known industry standards for platter size dimensions. We can't assume that Hitachi GST, WD, Toshiba and Seagate SFF 7900rpm drives all have the same platter dimensions, for example. Ditto at the 3.5-inch level. We can be reasonably certain, though, that at the largest capacity sizes in any form factor and low-to mid-speed rotation the largest possible platters are put inside the cases.

So remember, when talking areal density your mileage may well vary and you have to be making apple-for-apples comparisons, which you won't know unless you're aware of the platter sizes involved. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.