Feeds

Juniper Networks swings $4.5m loss in Q1

Blames economic death and taxes

The essential guide to IT transformation

Juniper Networks swung a net loss of $4.5 million in its first quarter of 2009, as a hefty one-time tax charge mixed rather nastily with telcos cutting their network spending in the recession.

Net income of -$4.5m in Juniper's three month quarter ended March 31 compared to a $110.4m gain in the same quarter last year. Not counting the non-recurring charges, net income was $91.6m, down 37 per cent year-over-year.

Juniper's coffers were made lighter by a $61.8m charge from "a change in California income tax law enacted during the first quarter of 2009." Then there were restructuring charges related to laying off 140 positions — which the firm says is half the planned workforce reductions in 2009.

Juniper financial chief Robyn Denholm said in the company's earnings conference call Thursday that most of the Q1 sackings were in sales and marketing. But when additional hirings in R&D and customer service during the quarter are taken into account, the company eliminated a net of 39 positions.

Net revenue was $764.2m, down 7 per cent year-over-year from $822.9m.

“Juniper has responded well to the challenging macroeconomic environment. "Our focus remains on balancing short-term market realities with our commitment to creating long-term shareholder value," said Kevin Johnson, Juniper's CEO in a prepared statement. "We’re doing that by aggressively and thoughtfully managing operating expenses to ensure that we maintain strong levels of investment in our innovation and customer focused initiatives."

Juniper's operating margin in Q1 declined to 10.6 per cent from 17.3 per cent in the same quarter a year ago.

Johnson said he's seeing more stability in the market because more customers now have their recession-ready budgets in place. Despite this, Johnson said visibility of what's ahead is still low.

Juniper expects the current quarter to be roughly flat with Q1, arriving somewhere between $740m and $780m. ®

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Ballmer leaves Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Broadband slow and expensive? Blame Telstra says CloudFlare
Won't peer, will gouge for Internet transit
prev story

Whitepapers

A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Maximize storage efficiency across the enterprise
The HP StoreOnce backup solution offers highly flexible, centrally managed, and highly efficient data protection for any enterprise.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.