The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Darling's £0.5bn offshore windfarm 'leccy-bill stealth levy

'3m windmill-powered homes' claim is pure spin

Cloud based data management

Budget 09 A lot of people are wondering how the British government can deliver colossal bank bailouts and pay rapidly-climbing dole bills - all the while collecting less taxes as people are laid off and companies founder - and yet still find money to subsidise green energy. Chancellor Alistair Darling has found a cunning way around the problem: he will simply raise electricity prices and channel the resulting cash into wind farms.

The process isn't described like that, of course. Mr Darling, presenting the Budget yesterday in parliament, put it like this:

We must build on Britain’s status as the world leader in offshore wind power generation.

The credit squeeze is holding back major offshore wind projects.

I want to lift the barriers – through £525m of new financial support over the next two years for off-shore wind, funded through the renewables obligation.

The potential is enormous. I am confident that this will lead to major projects getting the go-ahead quickly, providing enough electricity to meet the needs of up to 3m households.

This is described in the national dailies thus:

There are currently 300,000 households supplied by energy from offshore wind farms, but the Government has pledged to increase that to 3.1 million with £525 million investment ...

Mr Darling also found £45 million for small scale renewables like wind turbines on houses ...

It seems that even with the revenues shrinking, bills climbing and the government's credit running out, Mr D has managed to find half a billion from the public coffers for offshore wind: remarkable.

Well, it would be remarkable if it were true. But it's not. The public coffers contain nothing but a bit of paper reading "IOU £beaucoup trillions, G Brown", and in fact that half-billion will be found from the pockets of electricity users. You and me, that is.

The key is the phrase "funded through the renewables obligation". If we delve deep (page 148) into the Treasury pdfs which provide detail on Mr Darling's speech, we find what the government actually plan to do.

Budget 2009 announces a banding review with the intention of increasing the banding of Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs) from 1.5 to 2.0 for offshore wind projects meeting specified completion criteria if they place new orders in 2009-10, and then 1.75 in 2010-11. This is expected to provide £525 million support from 2011 to 2014, protecting 3 GW of proposed investment over the next two years, enough to power an estimated 2.8 million homes.

The Renewables Obligation scheme is the only reason there is any renewable energy in the UK at all. As renewable juice costs more to make than coal, gas or nuclear - and generally has the added disadvantage that you can't turn it on and off on demand - companies wouldn't normally be able to sell it.

SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had

Anonymous Coward

@frank

There's a difference Nuclear would have yeilded huge rewards (just look at how much cash the French make flogging power to us), where as ground/sea based wind farms shall never be anything more then a plaything no matter how much money you pour down the drain.

Sadly we gave up on nuclear becouse people are stupid and now we burn cash on crap becouse it fellates the idiots.

2
0

How to save energy for nothing

What about shutting down the Energy Saving Trust ? I've just noticed on their website they have these gems of wisdom:

"Let the sunshine in - cleaning windows and pulling back curtains during the day will help you take in more natural light and warmth from the sun."

"clean your oven door - you'll be able to check on food without opening the oven and letting heat out"

Thats the planet saved then......

1
0

Missing the point?

If we're going to build these things, we might as well do it now. The price of raw materials has dropped dramatically in the last while and we have gaps appearing in electricity generation in the next few years.

I'd rather indirectly help to pay for this during a period of low inflation and low commodity prices than in another 5-10 years, with everything increasing in price again and brown outs meaning the planning process is driven by a mad public panic.

Same with nuclear plants. Just do it and stop fucking around. We have a golden period of opportunity (end of one government / beginning of another) for this to be pushed through and for it all to be forgotten about by the time the next election comes around.

1
0

More from The Register

New material enables 1,000-meter super-skyscrapers
Before you read on, see if you can guess how the new stuff will be used
Boffins build headless robo-kitties
Soft kitty, warm kitty, cuddly little ball of wire kitty
 breaking news
Latest NASA ASTRONAUT class is HALF FEMALE
Newbie 'nauts include lady Marine fighter pilot, male doctor
 breaking news
You've seen the Large Hadron Collider. Now comes the HUGE Hadron Collider
International Linear Collider ready to rock and roll
Boffins find evidence Atlantic Ocean has started closing
'Embryonic subduction zone' that flattened Lisbon headed for Blighty
House bill: 'Hey NASA, that asteroid retrieval plan? Fuggedaboutit'
Republican-led committee also swings budget axe at climate science
Google launches broadband balloons, radio astronomy frets
A careless Loon could blind the square kilometre array
Hubble spies unlikely planet being born in hostile neighborhood
Hoovering a cloud of sand 7.5 billion miles from a tiny star
 breaking news
Jaguar to open new car-making factory in Blighty (virtually)
Britain still makes stuff, it's just not real any more...
 breaking news
Spin doctors brazenly fiddle with tiny bits in front of the neighbours
Quantum computer address bus just nanometres wide