Feeds

Blade server standards coming this year

But who will adopt them?

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

A standard to which no big vendors adhere is as intimidating as a tiger with its teeth and claws removed. And so it might be with the standards for blade servers that the Server Systems Infrastructure (SSI) forum is trying to get into the field.

Since the advent of commercial blade servers at the turn of the millennium, corporate customers have decried the lack of standards even as they cut checks. Blade servers are much older in the telecommunication industry, and server infrastructure for telcos has long since been standardized and ruggedized.

It's reasonable to wonder why there isn't a set of standard blade-server chassis, backplanes and midplanes, blade-server and switch form factors, and interchangeable mezzanine cards. It's reasonable - but such standardization would remove account and product line control and create too aggressive a market for competition.

Vendors charge a premium for the density and ease of configuration and management that blades offer, but that hefty premium is one of the reasons why blade servers still only account for about 10 per cent of global server sales after eight years of sales. It should be double or triple that level, given the real and substantial TCO benefits that blades offer.

According to a report in EE Times, the SSI this week put out a set of draft server specifications at the 0.9-release level that Intel and its partners hope will be adhered to by server and peripheral makers.

Intel and 31 other makers of servers, motherboards, peripherals, switches, and other electronic components affiliated with blade servers support these standards. But thus far IBM seems content to push its BladeCenter design in concert with Intel through the Blade.org consortium. Hewlett-Packard, today's dominant blade shipper, and Dell and Sun Microsystems, which are getting traction with their blades, are not part of the SSI effort.

Considering that HP, IBM, Dell, and Sun account for nearly all blade server sales, this is a big shortcoming. None of these vendors have said they want a standard chassis with standard blades and peripherals that would allow customers to use any vendors' products they choose.

To its credit, last fall IBM opened up the switch specifications for the BladeCenter chassis to the SSI. That's a step, but that doesn't make SSI a standard as much as it lets IBM kinda wink and nod and say it is adhering to a standard when what it is actually doing is suggesting that its way of linking switches to blades is a standard, and one that is sanctioned by SSI.

Last fall was also when SSI started charging dues, ranging from $5,000 to $50,000 a year, from members to help fund the standards effort. It was also when SSI put together a presentation (PDF) explaining its mission, its new organization, and the basics of the standards it is proposing for blade, switch, and card form factors.

Jim Ryan, an IBM marketing manager and SSI chairman, admitted last September that the consortium members had been hoping to get a draft of the SSI specifications into the field in late 2007 with products adhering to them coming to market in 2008. As is clear, they didn't make it. The blade-standards effort is taking more time than originally planned, seeing as how the standards are not yet at the 1.0 release level - you can see the list of draft specifications here.)

SSI was not available for comment at press time, and we have not been able to unearth a formal announcement of the specifications.

It would be interesting to see customer pressure applied to vendors to adopt standard chassis and blade form factors and interconnects, but this seems unlikely. And it is certainly something that the dominant blade players don't want, either.

So don't hold your breath. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
Azure TITSUP caused by INFINITE LOOP
Fat fingered geo-block kept Aussies in the dark
NASA launches new climate model at SC14
75 days of supercomputing later ...
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
Cloud unicorns are extinct so DiData cloud mess was YOUR fault
Applications need to be built to handle TITSUP incidents
BOFH: WHERE did this 'fax-enabled' printer UPGRADE come from?
Don't worry about that cable, it's part of the config
Stop the IoT revolution! We need to figure out packet sizes first
Researchers test 802.15.4 and find we know nuh-think! about large scale sensor network ops
DEATH by COMMENTS: WordPress XSS vuln is BIGGEST for YEARS
Trio of XSS turns attackers into admins
SanDisk vows: We'll have a 16TB SSD WHOPPER by 2016
Flash WORM has a serious use for archived photos and videos
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Go beyond APM with real-time IT operations analytics
How IT operations teams can harness the wealth of wire data already flowing through their environment for real-time operational intelligence.
The total economic impact of Druva inSync
Examining the ROI enterprises may realize by implementing inSync, as they look to improve backup and recovery of endpoint data in a cost-effective manner.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.