The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

As Sun unravels, it's time for a new suit

Update: Sun says not so

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

Opinion With IBM reportedly breaking off the engagement, Sun must reinvent itself if it is to go it alone. That means bringing in a Joe Tucci lookalike to reform and restructure the business.

This is a highly personal opinion about how and why it should undertake that process. First of all, Sun's board and senior management need to recognise a few things that have become blindingly obvious to a lot of outside observers.

First of all, Sun cannot meaningfully monetise its massive developer download base. Those tens of millions of copies of Solaris, Java and other pieces of Sun software are bringing in diddly-squat revenues set against Sun's overall business and what it should be capable of doing.

Next, Sun cannot profitably survive in any sizeable way as a me-too x86 server vendor. It cannot prosper in any meaningfully-sized way as an open source software supplier and services vendor either, despite MySQL, Java and Open Solaris.

The Sun AMD play has run out of steam. Sun's hybrid server/storage play - the X4500 and similar products - is a limited niche offering that won't go very far. Sun's proprietary SPARC microprocessor architecture and the hardware built using it is severely threatened by Nehalem. Sun's mainframe tape storage business is a niche and always will be. Its mainstream disk drive arrays are me-too and going nowhere.

Their development has been crippled by Sun's focus on its Open Storage systems. This Open Storage effort, despite its coming in layered or tiered flash cache editions, with system software tweaked to use it, will not revolutionise the storage industry. Sun is wrong when it asserts that proprietary storage architectures will go the same way as proprietary server architectures and be washed away by commodity hardware and open source software, like Sun's Open Storage 7000 line. They won't.

Ditto Open Networking.

Next?

So, assuming these points are recognised, where does Sun go from here if it is not bought?

Continuing with its present strategy, which has been discredited by the company sale stories and by comprehensive business under-performance, should not be an option. Continuing with the present senior management team is also not viable. The first order of business by the board should be to choose a new CEO.

This CEO should have a deep and comprehensive understanding of the existing server, storage and software industry and markets, and be young enough to lead the company for, say, ten years of energetic activity. He or she should have rock-solid technology business leadership and execution experience, and a proven ability to take a ramshackle collection of underperforming businesses and turn them into a coherent and sustainably profitable whole.

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

Latest Comments

@Kevin

Kevin,

This is exactly why investors need to push to Sun's board that they need to get Apple on the negotiations table. If Apple were to buy Sun and or make them a subdivision like Filemaker Sun would be back in business. Not only do Sun's offerings complement Apple's but both company cultures can easily fit in. Sun can essentially become Apple Enterprise and focus on making entreprise software easy to use not only in Apple's creative markets and education but in Sun's current markets.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Apple and Sun

Apple would also provide the leadership and creative vision that Sun lacks. Sun has great engineers but horrible marketing.

0
0

@Chris Mellor: Please Understand Open

The writer Chris Mellor states, "Sun's proprietary SPARC microprocessor architecture and the hardware built using it is..."

Once again, a writer does not understand what proprietary is.

Merriam-Webster says "proprietary" is - "something that is used, produced, or marketed under exclusive legal right of the inventor or maker"

http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/proprietary

SPARC is a SPECIFICATION created through various groups of contributors, published, and implemented by anyone who wants to.

http://sparc.org/

SPARC is not owned by SUN, rather it is a specification which MANY companies, both past and present, have created microprocessors for, sometimes competing against SUN.

Historically, there have been many SPARC vendors - many had competed with SUN.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARC

* Bipolar Integrated Technology (BIT)

* Cypress Semiconductor

* Fujitsu and Fujitsu Microelectronics

* HAL Computer Systems

* LSI Logic

* Metaflow Technologies

* Ross Technology, Inc

* Solbourne Computer

* Weitek

* Afara Websystems

I am not sure what the rest of the article says. If the writer can't understand what the word "proprietary" means, what "SPARC" is, and how those terms relate to SUN as well as other vendors, the article is probably not worth it's bits in transmission.

0
0

More from The Register

Thanks, NSA: Amazon sales of Orwell's 1984 rise 9,500%
Citizens of Oceania bone up on the new reality
 breaking news
BBC lied to Parliament about doomed £100m IT monster, thunder MPs
Axed DMI ballooned and burst while watchdogs sang Kumbaya
Microsoft to open Windows Stores inside 600 Best Buy locations
Product showcases 'must be seen to be believed'
 breaking news
Author Iain (M) Banks falls to cancer at 59
Misses the release of his final work
 breaking news
What did the Lehman Brothers implosion look like to a techie?
Insider tells all about the Gnab Gib at Lehmans
It's official: 'tweet' an English word – not just in the avian sense
If the Oxford English Dictionary says it is so, then it is so
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
1-in-10 e-tomes 'are self-published'... most are 'rubbish' says book ed
Publishing man scoffs at go-it-alone writers, ursines still fouling in forests
 breaking news