Leaked memo says Conficker pwns Parliament
House of Commons systems borked
Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything
Updated The House of Commons IT systems has reportedly been infected by the infamous Conficker superworm, which has previously infected millions of Windows PCs and affected the operation of hospitals, military and large corporate systems.
Political blog Dizzy Thinks first reported that a memo (below) sent out to parliamentary IT network users on Tuesday night warned that Conficker had disrupted the operation of parliamentary systems.
The infection has reportedly prompted a clean-up operation as well as a temporary ban on the use of mass storage devices, including MP3 players, on parliamentary systems.
To: All users connecting directly to the Parliamentary NetworkThe Parliamentary Network has been affected by a virus known as conficker. This virus affects users by slowing down the Network and by locking out some accounts. We are continuining [sic] to work with our third party partners to manage its removal and we need to act swiftly to clean computers that are infected.
We are scanning the Network and if we identify any equipment which we believe is infected with the virus then we will contact you to ensure that the device is either removed from the Network or cleaned and loaded with the correct software to prevent this infection reoccurring.
You can help us to contain this problem and prevent new infection by adhering to the following advice:
* We are unable to clean PCs and portable computers which are either not switched on or which are not authorised devices. We therefore ask that if you are running a PC or portable computer not authorised to be on the Network that you take it off immediately.
* An additional characteristic of this virus is that for some types of files it can skip direct to the Network from a USB memory stick or other portable storage device (e.g. mp3 players) without hitting the virus checker software. We ask that for the time being you do not use memory sticks or any other portable storage devices on the Parliamentary Network.
* If you do identify a problem with the equipment you are running, please contact the PICT Service Desk on 020 7219 **** when it reopens on Wednesday 25 March from 8am.
* If you are connecting using one of our remote access services, from a Constituency Office for example, a separate communication will be sent to you.
Director of Parliamentary ICT.
Our call to the service desk was referred upwards. We've left a message with ICT management. Inquiries to the All Parliamentary Internet Group and parliamentary IT lobby group Eurim are also yet to shed any light on the matter.
However one House of Commons source, who requested anonymity, confirmed to El Reg that the memo is genuine. He added that the House of Commons network had been "slow for most of the week" and acting like it was "hand cranked", although its performance had improved a bit by Friday once the clean-up operation got under way. The prohibition of plugging mobile devices into the network was likely to inconvience MPs and other who synchronised their phones with their desktops, he added.
The memo came from a credible source who has shed light on other goings-on involving parliamentary IT systems.
Dizzy Thinks previously reported that the Parliamentary ICT department had told users that PGP was incompatible with its remote access software, for reasons neither El Reg nor PGP have been able to unravel to date.
Earlier this month El Reg reported that police failed to record a crime, much less investigate, when Alun Michael MP reported a computer in his office was infected with malware. Michael was able to detect and remove the malware himself.
It's unclear what strain of malware was involved in that attack, much less whether the two reported incidents are somehow linked.
The security of parliamentary PCs is more sensitive than those of regular office system because of the confidentiality of MPs' correspondence with their constituents, to say nothing of the effect that borked systems might have on the day-to-day business of Parliament.
It's known that Colt Telecom supplies the connectivity and that MessageLabs, a security sub-contractor, handles the anti-spam and anti-virus filtering on the parliamentary internet connection.
Conficker spreads through several update mechanisms, a well-known Windows vulnerability and tainted USB drives being just two. Once it secures a foothold on an infected network, the worm can spread widely across network shares by exploiting weak password security, a major factor in its high prevalence within corporate systems. Spreading by email isn't one of the infection vectors used by Conficker.
Nonetheless, as a security sub-contractor you'd expect MessageLabs, with a noted team of anti-virus experts, to be among the third-party partners asked to roll its sleeves up and sort out the apparent virus infection problems on parliamentary systems. If so MessageLabs is staying schtum, perhaps for understandable reasons of client confidentiality.
We asked MessageLabs for comment on Thursday on the issue, but we're yet to hear back.
News of the reported infection of parliamentary systems comes at a time when Conficker is back under the spotlight, as security watchers count down to the start of a new update mechanism, due to come online for systems infected by the latest variant of the malware from 1 April. Whether this event will coincide with the activation of the botnet for malign purposes, such as sending spam, remains unclear. Even in the simple act of spreading the worm has caused huge disruption.
The UK's Ministry of Defence reported that that the worm had spread across some of its offices, as well as desktops aboard various Royal Navy warships. Hospitals in Sheffield reported infection of over 800 computers back in February. Other corporate victims of the malware include judicial systems in the city of Houston and the Bundeswehr (German Army).
A handy FAQ on Conficker by F-secure can be found here. A technical analysis of the worm can be found in a paper by SRI International here. ®
COMMENTS
AC@14:11, AC@14:25, AC@21:34
AC@14:11
Glad to know that the cheapest kind of bandwidth you can get is still someone else's. And if people will run wireless routers without even bothering with encryption it always will be.
AC@14:25
My apologies. It seems the boys from Bratislava are already here.
AC@21:34
I think you should treat the Pict guys post with a large pinch of salt.
Mind you this system does have some benefits. Any accidental discovery of any "inappropriate" content on an MPs PC can be met by "Our network was wide open. Anyone could have put that on there. I did not know that sharing my hard drive on the network was risky"
Not that I am suggesting there *is* anything to find. But I'm sure any MP could find a lawyer who could argue this one. Given the number of MPs who are lawyers anyway the odds are they could do it themselves.
No wonder they are infected
Connecting home wireless routers onto a LAN, I can't believe it! Talk about a bunch of monkeys!
The entire IT management team should be sacked. Talk about lack of security, why have proxy's and firewalls when you can bypass this by connecting to a wireless router!
As for the pict worker, have you never heard of SMS or deploying the patch via a login script?
I can't believe in this day and age Parliament is sending out engineer to manually install AV and security patches. I am sure this isn't the last time you will be infected and I am fairly sure your system has already been infiltrated by Russia/China hackers.
And to think this is the same government that wants to start a National ID database.....
@AC 14:25
Obviously the Indian Call centre responding here then.

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
What you need to know about cloud backup
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything