Feeds

Asus pulps Apple in hardware reliability survey

But the real success was Lenovo

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Asus has stolen the top spot from Apple in a report that assesses the reliability of top PC manufacturer’s machines.

Put together by US PC repair and support firm Rescuecom, the league table was topped by Asus with a whopping 972 reliability points. Apple, now in second place, scored just 324 points.

Rescuecom’s scores are derived from 15,000 support calls made to the company during Q4 2008 and how those calls are divided among the major PC brands. It also takes into account the quarterly US market share of each PC supplier – figures Rescuecom takes from market watcher IDC.

For example, Asus had a 1.6 per cent Q4 market share, but only 0.2 per cent of calls to Rescuecom’s call centre were about Asus PCs. By contrast, Apple had a 6.8 per cent market share, but 2.1 per cent of call centre calls were about firm’s PCs.

In Rescuecom’s previous version of the report, an annual survey published back in December, Apple scored 700. Asus didn’t feature.

But the real winner is Lenovo, which scored 348 points this time around, just ahead of Apple's 324 points. Asus' score was massively boosted by a sudden surge in sales toward the end of the year, driven by sales of the Eee PC 1000 series, Rescuecom told Register Hardware.

For this reason, David Milman, Rescuecom's CEO, said that Asus’ reliability score should be “taken with a grain of salt”. In other words, its score was something of a 'statistical anomaly'. Not so Lenovo's and for that reason the ThinkPad maker was awarded joint first place with Asus, despite the big differences in their scores.

Toshiba’s score dropped from 299 points in the December version of the report, to 172 points this time around – based on a market share of 5.8 per cent and call centre proportion of 3.4 per cent.

Acer sits just below Toshiba with 151 points. It didn’t feature on Rescuecom’s last report, but the support firm added that – in this latest version - eight per cent of calls received during the quarter were about Acer machines and that it had a 12 per cent market share.

Although HP had a 15.3 per cent market share during Q1, Rescuecom awarded the firm just 142 points – a drop of 42 points from the previous report. Unsurprisingly, the highest percentage of support calls – 17.9 per cent – was about HP machines. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
Chipmaker FTDI bricking counterfeit kit
USB-serial imitators whacked by driver update
Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?
The Fourth Amendment... and it IS better
Don't wait for that big iPad, order a NEXUS 9 instead, industry little bird says
Google said to debut next big slab, Android L ahead of Apple event
Microsoft to enter the STRUGGLE of the HUMAN WRIST
It's not just a thumb war, it's total digit war
A drone of one's own: Reg buyers' guide for UAV fanciers
Hardware: Check. Software: Huh? Licence: Licence...?
The Apple launch AS IT HAPPENED: Totally SERIOUS coverage, not for haters
Fandroids, Windows Phone fringe-oids – you wouldn't understand
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.