The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Oracle and HP proposed joint Sun dismemberment deal

Big-Blue blocker

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery

Oracle and Hewlett-Packard are believed to have made a joint offer for Sun Microsystems in a deal totaling more than $2bn.

Under the deal, database giant Oracle would have taken Sun's software portfolio for $2bn, leaving HP with Sun's vast Solaris, Sparc, and x86 server products, manufacturing and distribution, and user base.

A potential deal between the three is understood to have been blocked by IBM, in the middle of talks to buy the whole of Sun for a reported $6.5bn.

Oracle, HP, and Sun declined to comment on what they called rumors, while IBM was unavailable for comment at the time of going to press.

A source, who didn't want to be identified, told The Reg that Oracle and HP had gone in to meet Sun to discuss the possible deal.

It's already been reported that Sun had been shopping itself around Silicon Valley, with HP named as a potential buyer.

This, though, is the first indication that HP had teamed with Larry Ellison's M&A beast Oracle - which has bought 50 companies in four years - to take only what they wanted from Sun. At $2bn, this would have been one of Oracle's large purchases, slotting behind PeopleSoft and BEA Systems.

Oracle and Sun parted ways on Java and on databases on Sparc a while back, partly thanks to Sun's $1bn purchase of the popular open-source database MySQL.

Of all Sun's software products, Oracle is likely to be most interested in owning this.

Despite what Sun thinks of itself as a software company, it has failed to build either a must-have software portfolio or a huge base of customers feeding Sun with license or services revenue around Java or open source.

The only bright spots are Solaris, Sun's directory and identity servers and MySQL. That's despite chief executive Jonathan Schwartz's rhetoric about making money from open-source in the cloud, which must be seen as an attempt to talk up the value of Sun's software assets and their potential.

MySQL would have had the most immediate interest for Oracle. Directory and identity are more complicated sells and Oracle has its own offerings. Oracle, meanwhile, has been distancing itself from anything to do with Sparc, as its systems relationship with Sun has cooled in recent years and the industry focus has shifted off Unix and Sparc and onto Linux and x86.

The database, though, has been growing relatively fast, although it has been tough converting free users into paying Sun customers.

Oracle, meanwhile, has failed to string together a decent open-source middleware strategy, from the time it let JBoss go to Red Hat to Oracle's predatory Red Hat support services that has fizzled.

An open-source database would give Oracle a big overnight presence among developers and in the OEM and web applications markets.

Oracle made a tentative play to undermine MySQL in 2006 when it purchased the InnoDB transactional storage engine. MySQL developers have since filled the InnoDB gap.

Had it been successful, a deal would likely have alarmed MySQL users and developers over the database's future, given Oracle's priority is paid, closed-source databases and the fact that it tried through InnoDB to kill MySQL.

That said, MySQL's future under Sun has also been looking uncertain. MySQL author Monty Widenius has left while former MySQL chief executive Marten Mickos will see his last day at Sun next Tuesday, following a farewell appearance at this week's Open Source Business Conference in San Francisco, California.

Other former MySQL executives are also believed to be looking for a way out of Sun. It is believed individuals in the MySQL management have been unhappy with the fact Sun's management has not been listening to their advice on strategy and direction. ®

What you need to know about cloud backup

Latest Comments

Laryy! Dear, dear Larry!

Larry is "all mouth and no trousers", as my Gran used to say. He only wants Sun's corpse for bragging rights, he can then stamp "Copyright Oracle Corp 200x" all over MySQL. I don't think he will kill it outright, indeed Oracle has bought other stuff and given it away free'ish, he simply wants to stamp his little red logo over everything Sun has/had. Then you will know "Who's the Daddy!"!

0
0

Did Oracle do any real damage via the InnoDB purchase?

"MySQL developers have since filled the InnoDB gap."

With what?

"given Oracle's ... tried through InnoDB to kill MySQL"

Did it succeed to any degree?

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Just some silly thoughts, I know.

What would make sense for IBM to keep from a Sun acquisition?

- Java. IBM hates Microsoft. Keeping Java keeps MS out of a serious bunch of business.

- Installed base. Sun has been the shining star in entry-level Unix deployments, Telcos, and,

when it comes to open systems in general, in the financial industry.

Sun has by far the biggest number of applications available on Solaris.

Most likely bigger then the sum of apps on AIX and HP-UX.

More or less as an experiment, Solaris tuns today already on Mainframes (zSeries) and

Unix machines (pSeries).

So why not enable Solaris to run on pSeries within an lpar, next to an AIX lpar, next to an i-OS lpar..?

This could definitely keep some Solaris customers on IBM Hardware.

And the migration from Sparc to Power would be good business for Global Services.

- MySQL? Maybe. just some sort of "DB2-lite" for the OpenSource community.

What IBM would dump:

- Sparc. Design and manufacturing of processors is a quite expensive thing to do,

and not under all circumstances profitable.

- Storage, x86 based Servers, Tape-Libraries, basically all hardware stuff.

The idea of Oracle and HP bidding together for Sun made no sense at all.

Biggest value from Sun is in software. This would have gone to Oracle.

All the hardware: hp would have stopped it immediately, since in most cases,

hp has equal or better offerings.

(Aside from Itanium... Rock would definitely have been a thing to look at..)

So hp would be left with the faith to "own" the installed base. Lol..

And, as usual (Wang, Apollo, Dec/Tru64, just to name a few) they'd throw away or ignore any

software-related technology that fell into their hands.

Including the customer base that bought those products because of the technology..

0
0