Sex offender email monitoring plan mothballed
UK.gov blames human rights judgment
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
A plan to require registered sex offenders to notify police of their email addresses and social networking identities has been shelved while the government battles a human rights judgment in the High Court, according to the Home Office.
The measure was the centrepiece of a suite of announcements on child protection on and offline in early April last year, but no detailed proposals have since emerged.
At the time Jacqui Smith said failure by the more than 30,000 registered sex offenders to supply online identities or supplying false identities would attract up to a five year jail term. "We need to patrol the internet to keep predators away from children in the same way as we patrol the real world," she told the breakfast television show GMTV.
However, in December the High Court found that indefinitely retaining details on the Sex Offenders Register with no right to appeal was a breach of offenders' human rights under European law.
A Home Office spokesman said officals had decided not to try to extend the reach of the sex offenders register online while government lawyers appeal that decision. He said the case had "an impact" on notification requirements, but was not able to explain how.
Other planned changes to the register, such as a trial of "Sarah's Law" allowing parents to demand details of sex offenders, have gone ahead.
The NSPCC, which supported plans to monitor internet use by sex offenders, said it had not heard of any developments. "It's hard to comment as we don't know enough about where this email register idea has got to," a spokesman said.
The policy was heavily criticised when it was announced by internet experts, who said the profusion of free email and social networking services and the simplicity of setting up new accounts would make it unworkable.
The Home Office said the government remains committed to collecting sex offender email addresses and social networking identities, which was first mooted by then-Home Secretary John Reid in February 2007. Last year it said the details of monitoring sex offenders' online identities would be handled by the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP).
CEOP declined to comment on progress, saying policy announcements were a matter for the Home Office. ®
COMMENTS
Give them the address and then some
I wonder how the government would take it if a sex offender got his own mailserver, and generated 10 million random email addresses for himself, each day, and sent the adresses as the wouldbe law states to police. There's no law that says you can't have more than one email addresses for yourself.
In a year police would end up with 3 650 000 000 email addresses for that single individual, provided it isn't a leap year. If the addresses were 30 letters long, that would mean 100 giga bytes of useless information, each year. And there's nothing stopping him from generatin 100 000 000 or even a few orders of magnitude more email addresses for himself each day.
If the government wants useless information it's best to provide them with it, overflowingly them with it. :)
CEOP declined to comment on progress
"saying policy announcements were a matter for the Home Office."
Sorry? Is this a different CEOP from the one that has been pushing for policies like this and many others, simply, it seems, to bolster their own position and preserve their jobs?
@David Glasgow
Ont let your child have a PC in their room. Have it out in the open.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Cloud based data management
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
