FoxIT update defends against PDF peril
Not just an Adobe problem
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
It's not only Adobe Reader that needs patching against maliciously constructed PDF files. Targeted attacks against an unpatched flaw in Adobe Reader over recent weeks has stimulated interest in alternative PDF viewers, such as FoxIT.
However FoxIT is also vulnerable to the same type of threat, promoting the release of a security update addressing three security bugs in the software on Monday. The update to FoxIT defends against a JBIG2 symbol dictionary processing error, a stack-based buffer overflow flaw and a security authorization bypass bug.
FoxIT Reader 3.0 and FoxIT Reader 2.3 both need patching as explained here.
The buffer-overflow bug is the worst of the three flaws and carries the most obvious risk of code-injection attacks. The JBIG2 processing bug also looks especially nasty, because it involves the same component as the target of confirmed attacks against Adobe Reader.
Updates to Adobe Acrobat and Reader are due on Wednesday (11 March) and is arguably more important not just because the user base of Adobe Reader dwarfs that of alternative viewers such as FoxIT and SumatraPDF but because the security bugs in Adobe's software are the focus of targeted hacking attacks over the last three weeks or so. ®
COMMENTS
@AC 10 Mar 20:48gmt
re: And For Preview?
Not that I know of; I only use Preview because I can't seem to find any other alternative PDF readers for MacOS for some odd reason.
Still, I'm kind of stuck with the Dried Mud Software Corp's Acrobat Pro on my machine as I work in graphic design, send out proofs and finals as "press-ready" PDF, and only Acrobatshit can display them properly for a final look before I send them out. Otherwise, I avoid Acrobatshit like... like...
...well, like Paris.
(yeah, yeah, I know, alright... finish beer>coat>door>subway)
Foxit virus
In the past, but if it could happen once...
http://forums.foxitsoftware.com/showthread.php?t=6366
But at least FoxIt has the balls to fess up to it, instead of trying to deny deny deny and sweep it under the rug like some other companies do.
its not just me then
i am glad I am not the only one that thinks adobe reader is a bloated pile of shite. I actively avoid bloody pdf files when at all possible.

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Data control in the cloud
Cloud based data management
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth