Feeds

Psion countersues Intel in not-netbook spat

Sold $60,000 worth of Netbooks last year, apparently

Security for virtualized datacentres

Psion Teklogix has filed a counterclaim against Intel in response to the chip giant's attempt to get its Netbook trademark nixed in the US.

The complaint - filed, like Intel's, with the US District Court for Northern California - wants Intel brought to book for allegedly infringing said trademark.

"Intel has acted willfully and maliciously, has unlawfully attempted to trade on the tremendous commercial value, reputation and goodwill of the Netbook mark, and has deliberately and intentionally confused and deceived the public as to an affiliation, connection or association of Intel with Psion, and/or as to the origin, sponsorship or approval of Intel’s goods and/or services," the PDA pioneer alleges.

Tremendous commercial value? Well, Psion claims it has sold $13,650 worth of Netbooks - specifically "laptop computers under Psion’s Netbook mark" - this year alone, down from a peak of just over $2m in 2006, after which sales fell to $586,680 in 2007 and $60,900 in 2008.

This despite the fact that the product has been officially end-of-life'd:

Psion 'discontinued' Netbook

How the Netbook is lauded on Psion's website

Still, the implication is clear: had Intel not muddied the waters by using the word 'netbook' generically, Psion's sales might have been higher.

That said, we'd note that Psion has singularly failed to take advantage of the situation to shift product on the back of the buzz around small, cheap computers. Pretty much every other computer vendor - Apple excepted - has.

"As a result of the plaintiff’s long use of the Netbook mark in association with Psion’s products and services, the Netbook mark has come to be recognised by the relevant consuming public as being sponsored by, approved by, authorized by, associated with or affiliated with Psion," the complaint maintains.

A straw poll conducted among shoppers in a well-known central London flagship computer shop reveals this to be highly questionable in the UK, if not the US. Not one of the "consuming public" we asked said anything about Psion when we mentioned the word 'netbook'. Eee PC. Acer. Apple and its lack of said product. But not Psion.

"Use by Intel of the designation Netbook has caused and is now causing severe and irreparable harm to Psion," the now-Canadian company claims. It wants a Jury trial, hoping the assembly will be more willing to support the underdog than the chip giant. ®

New hybrid storage solutions

More from The Register

next story
Apple iPhone 6: Missing sapphire glass screen FAIL explained
They just cannae do it in time, says analyst
Slap my Imp up: Bullfrog's Dungeon Keeper
Monsters need to earn a living too
Oh noes, fanbois! iPhone 6 Plus shipments 'DELAYED' in the UK
Is EMBIGGENED Apple mobile REALLY that popular?
Apple's big bang: iPhone 6, ANOTHER iPhone 6 Plus and WATCH OUT
Let's >sigh< see what Cupertino has been up to for the past year
Apple Pay is a tidy payday for Apple with 0.15% cut, sources say
Cupertino slurps 15 cents from every $100 purchase
The Apple Watch and CROTCH RUBBING. How are they related?
Plus: 'NostrilTime' wristjob vid action
Apple's SNEAKY plan: COPY ANDROID. Hello iPhone 6, Watch
Sizes, prices and all – but not for the wrist-o-puter
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.